Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923135›Full record

Trial reportWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2022

EBP education and skills building for leaders: An RCT to promote EBP infrastructure, process and implementation in a comprehensive cancer center.

Sharon Tucker, Molly McNett, Colleen O'Leary, Robin Rosselet, Jinjian Mu, Bindu Thomas, Lynn Gallagher-Ford, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sharon TuckerHelene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for EBP, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4217-1559
Molly McNettImplementation/Translation Science Core, Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for EBP, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-2535
Colleen O'LearyEvidence-Based Practice James Cancer Hospital Department of Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6542-212X
Robin RosseletJames Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jinjian MuThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Bindu ThomasThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lynn Gallagher-FordClinical Core, The Fuld Institute for EBP, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Bernadette Mazurek MelnykHelene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for EBP, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-1198

Funding

The Fisher Leadership Institute Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare remains challenging. The influence of leadership has been recognized. However, few randomized trials have tested effects of an educational and skills building intervention for leaders in clinical settings.

aimsTest effects of an EBP leadership immersion intervention on EBP attributes over time among two cohorts of leaders at a national comprehensive cancer center.

methodsA stratified, randomized, wait-list group, controlled design was conducted. Participants received the evidence-based intervention one year apart (2020, n = 36; 2021, n = 30) with EBP knowledge, beliefs, competencies, implementation self-efficacy, implementation behaviors, and organizational readiness measured at pre- and post-intervention, and one- and two-year follow-ups. Participants applied learnings to a specific clinical or organization priority topic.

resultsBaseline outcomes variables and demographics did not differ between cohorts except for age and years of experience. Both cohorts demonstrated significant changes in EBP attributes (except organizational readiness) post-intervention. Mixed linear modeling revealed group by time effects at 3-months for all EBP attributes except implementation behaviors and organizational readiness after the first intervention, favoring cohort 2020, with retained effects for EBP beliefs and competencies at one year. Following Cohort 2021 intervention, at 12-weeks post-intervention, implementation behaviors were significantly higher for cohort 2021. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: An intensive EBP intervention can increase healthcare leaders' EBP knowledge and competencies. Aligning EBP projects with organizational priorities is strategic. Follow-up with participants to retain motivation, knowledge and competencies is essential. Future research must demonstrate effects on clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeNeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareHumansLeadershipLearningSelf EfficacySurveys and Questionnairesadministrationcancercurriculumeducationevidence-based practiceexperimental researchintervention researchleadershiplearningmanagementoncologyorganizationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35923135
PMCPMC9804542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.