Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922866›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Depression and anxiety among online learning students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Luísa Pelucio, Pedro Simões, Marcia Cristina Nascimento Dourado, Laiana A Quagliato, Antonio Egidio Nardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nanoencapsulation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luísa PelucioInstitute of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. luisapelucio@hotmail.com.
Pedro SimõesDepartament of Sociology and Political Science, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
Marcia Cristina Nascimento DouradoInstitute of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
Laiana A QuagliatoInstitute of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
Antonio Egidio NardiInstitute of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic introduced a global need to explore the potential and challenges of online education.

objectiveTo evaluate the presence of depression and anxiety in university students and their level of satisfaction with online learning during the period of social isolation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodA cross-sectional design was used to evaluate 152 online learning students from six different university courses: Medicine, Psychology, Law, Engineering, Physiotherapy, and Business. The evaluation of the participants was carried out through an online survey in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Also, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess participants mental health.

resultsMost of the participants reported emotional impact, followed by learning impact, financial impact, social impact, and technological impact, with a significant difference in the presence of depressive symptoms, but no significant difference in anxiety. The participants presented moderate anxiety levels, with no significant differences between genders, and mild levels of depressive symptoms with significant differences between genders. Also, younger students were more anxious than older students. In addition, female students with less social contact presented more depressive symtoms.

conclusionFrom a clinical perspective, the findings provide insights into mental health among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings may help in the development of effective screening strategies and in the formulation of interventions that improve the mental health of students.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceAnxietyBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2StudentsUniversitiesAnxietyDepressionMental healthOnline learningPandemicStudents

Identifiers

PMID35922866
PMCPMC9346054
OpenAlexW4289517530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.