Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922853›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Evaluation of a collaborative ambulatory orthopedic care program for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparative observational cohort study.

Angelina Müller, Olga A Amberger, Anastasiya Glushan, Claudia Witte, Renate Klaaßen-Mielke, Burkhard Lembeck, Martin Beyer, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Kateryna Karimova

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The utility of website-based quality improvement tools for health professionals: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angelina MüllerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. a.mueller@allgemeinmedizin.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-7000
Olga A AmbergerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anastasiya GlushanInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Claudia WitteaQua, Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.
Renate Klaaßen-MielkeInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Burkhard LembeckJoint Practice for Orthopaedic and Trauma, Hindenburgstr. 7/1, 73730, Ostfildern, Germany.
Martin BeyerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ferdinand M GerlachInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kateryna KarimovaInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

Federal Joint Committee, Germany 01VSF17002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2014, the novel orthopedic care program was established by the AOK health insurance fund in southern Germany to improve ambulatory care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The program offers extended consultation times, structured collaboration between general practitioners and specialists, as well as a renewed focus on guideline-recommended therapies and patient empowerment. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the program on health service utilization in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study, which is based on claims data, evaluated health service utilization in patients with hip and knee OA from 2014 to 2017. The intervention group comprised OA patients enrolled in collaborative ambulatory orthopedic care, and the control group received usual care. The outcomes were participation in exercise interventions, prescription of physical therapy, OA-related hospitalization, and endoprosthetic surgery rates. Generalized linear regression models were used to analyze the effect of the intervention.

resultsClaims data for 24,170 patients were analyzed. Data for the 23,042 patients in the intervention group were compared with data for the 1,128 patients in the control group. Participation in exercise interventions (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.781; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.230-2.577; p = 0.0022), and overall prescriptions of physical therapy (Rate Ratio (RR): 1.126; 95% CI: 1.025-1.236; p = 0.0128) were significantly higher in the intervention group. The intervention group had a significantly lower risk of OA -related hospitalization (OR: 0.375; 95% CI: 0.290-0.485; p < 0.0001). Endoprosthetic surgery of the knee was performed in 53.8% of hospitalized patients in the intervention group vs. 57.5% in the control group; 27.7% of hospitalized patients underwent endoprosthetic surgery of the hip in the intervention group versus 37.0% in the control group.

conclusionsIn patients with hip and knee OA, collaborative ambulatory orthopedic care is associated with a lower risk of OA-related hospitalization, higher participation in exercise interventions, and more frequently prescribed physical therapy.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeAmbulatory CareCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesCollaborative careHealth service utilizationHospitalization riskMultivariable analysisOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID35922853
PMCPMC9347081
OpenAlexW4289544928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.