Trial reportBMC pediatrics2022
Oral lactase for infantile colic: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06299358 (The Effect of Foot Massage and Maternal Heart Sound on Colic and Comfort Levels in Infants With Infantile Colic), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Foot Massage and Maternal Heart Sound on Colic and Comfort Levels in Infants With Infantile Colic
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the effectiveness of oral lactase enzyme and lactose-free formula in the management of secondary lactose intolerance in persistent and severe persistent diarrhea.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Awareness about Neonatal Lactose Intolerance among Chinese Neonatologists in Outpatient Settings: A Multi-Center Survey.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Simethicone Medication Should Be Avoided in Infants Receiving Oral Lactase Treatment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluating the impact of lactase supplementation on infant colic: Study protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.JPGN reports · 2024Review
- Article
- Effectiveness of a starch thickened infant formula with reduced lactose content, probiotics and prebiotics on quality of life and clinical outcome in infants with regurgitation and/or colic.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfantile colic is a common problem during the first three months of life. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in an urban hospital in Delhi, India evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral lactase in management of infantile colic.
methodsOne hundred sixty-two clinically healthy infants aged < 5 months age [mean (SD) = 63.5 (30.5) days] fulfilling the Rome-IV diagnostic criteria for infantile colic were enrolled. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive 5 drops of lactase (600 FCC units/mL) (n = 80) or placebo (n = 82) mixed with breast milk or formula feed four times a day for a duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were duration of crying or fussing (min/d), and number of days with colic lasting > 3 h/d; secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction and adverse events.
resultsAt the end of four weeks, mean (SD) crying or fussing time (min/d) was significantly shorter in infants receiving lactase in comparison to placebo [89.9 (115.2) vs.178.5 (153.2); P = 0.001]. The mean (SD) number of days with colic was also significantly less in the lactase group as compared to placebo group at the end of the treatment [12.1 (7.8) vs 17.6 (8.4); P < 0.001]. By the end of 4
conclusionsOral lactase treatment in infantile colic results in symptomatic relief in terms of shortening of duration of crying or fussing, and better parental satisfaction.
trial registrationClinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2017/12/010930) registered on 20/12/2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.