Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922755›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Inhibition of hyperprogressive cancer disease induced by immune-checkpoint blockade upon co-treatment with meta-tyrosine and p38 pathway inhibitor.

Daniela R Montagna, Alejandra Duarte, Paula Chiarella, Bárbara Rearte, Oscar D Bustuoabad, Mónica Vermeulen, Raúl A Ruggiero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela R MontagnaLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Instituto de Medicina Experimental (IMEX-CONICET), Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. daniela.r.montagna@gmail.com.
Alejandra DuarteLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, IMEX-CONICET, Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula ChiarellaLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Instituto de Medicina Experimental (IMEX-CONICET), Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bárbara RearteLaboratory of Physiology of Inflammatory Processes, IMEX-CONICET, Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Oscar D BustuoabadLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Instituto de Medicina Experimental (IMEX-CONICET), Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mónica VermeulenLaboratory of Antigen Presenting Cells and Inflammatory Response, IMEX-CONICET, Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Raúl A RuggieroLaboratory of Experimental Oncology, Instituto de Medicina Experimental (IMEX-CONICET), Academia Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Academia Nacional de Medicina · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are overall promissory for cancer treatment, they entail, in some cases, an undesired side-effect called hyperprogressive-cancer disease (HPD) associated with acceleration of tumor growth and shortened survival.

methodsTo understand the mechanisms of HPD we assayed the ICI therapy on two murine tumors widely different regarding immunogenicity and, subsequently, on models of local recurrences and metastases of these tumors. To potentiate the immune response (IR), we combined ICI with meta-tyrosine-that counteracts immune-suppressive signals-and a selective inhibitor of p38 pathway that proved to counteract the phenomenon of tumor-immunostimulation.

resultsICI were therapeutically effective against both tumor models (proportionally to their immunogenicity) but only when they faced incipient tumors. In contrast, ICI produced acceleration of large and residual tumors. The combined treatment strongly inhibited the growth of large tumors and it managed to cure 80% of mice with local recurrences and 60% of mice bearing residual metastases.

conclusionsTumor enhancement was paradoxically correlated to a weak increase of the antitumor IR suggesting that a weak IR - different from a strong tumor-inhibitory one-may produce stimulation of tumor growth, mimicking the HPD observed in some clinical settings.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAnimalsDisease ProgressionMiceTyrosine3-tyrosineImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTyrosineHyperprogressive cancer diseaseImmune checkpoints inhibitorsMetastasesMeta-tyrosineMurine tumors

Identifiers

PMID35922755
PMCPMC9347122
OpenAlexW4289544318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.