Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922644›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Physiological measurements in social acceptance of self driving technologies.

Zsolt Palatinus, Márta Volosin, Eszter Csábi, Emese Hallgató, Edina Hajnal, Miklós Lukovics, Szabolcs Prónay, Tamás Ujházi, Lilla Osztobányi, Balázs Szabó and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zsolt PalatinusDepartment of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. palatinus.zsolt.ferenc@szte.hu.
Márta VolosinDepartment of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. volosin.marta@szte.hu.
Eszter CsábiDepartment of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Emese HallgatóDepartment of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Edina HajnalDepartment of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Miklós LukovicsFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Economics and Economic Development, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. miki@eco.u-szeged.hu.
Szabolcs PrónayFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Institute of Business Studies, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamás UjháziFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Institute of Business Studies, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Lilla OsztobányiMindtech Ltd., Vác, Hungary.
Balázs SzabóMindtech Ltd., Vác, Hungary.
Tamás KrálikMindtech Ltd., Vác, Hungary.
Zoltán Majó-PetriFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Institute of Business Studies, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HUPázmány Péter Catholic University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the present study is to examine the cognitive/affective physiological correlates of passenger travel experience in autonomously driven transportation systems. We investigated the social acceptance and cognitive aspects of self-driving technology by measuring physiological responses in real-world experimental settings using eye-tracking and EEG measures simultaneously on 38 volunteers. A typical test run included human-driven (Human) and Autonomous conditions in the same vehicle, in a safe environment. In the spectrum analysis of the eye-tracking data we found significant differences in the complex patterns of eye movements: the structure of movements of different magnitudes were less variable in the Autonomous drive condition. EEG data revealed less positive affectivity in the Autonomous condition compared to the human-driven condition while arousal did not differ between the two conditions. These preliminary findings reinforced our initial hypothesis that passenger experience in human and machine navigated conditions entail different physiological and psychological correlates, and those differences are accessible using state of the art in-world measurements. These useful dimensions of passenger experience may serve as a source of information both for the improvement and design of self-navigating technology and for market-related concerns.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingSocial StatusAutomationEye MovementsHumansTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35922644
PMCPMC9349214
OpenAlexW4289550199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.