Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922583›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2022

Characteristics and therapeutic strategies of radiation-induced glioma: case series and comprehensive literature review.

Shumpei Onishi, Fumiyuki Yamasaki, Vishwa Jeet Amatya, Takeshi Takayasu, Ushio Yonezawa, Akira Taguchi, Shinji Ohba, Yukio Takeshima, Nobutaka Horie, Kazuhiko Sugiyama

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shumpei OnishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. shumpei.ohnishi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4156-6540
Fumiyuki YamasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Vishwa Jeet AmatyaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Takeshi TakayasuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Ushio YonezawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Akira TaguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Shinji OhbaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, 3-1 Aoyama-cho, Kure City, Hiroshima, 737-0023, Japan.
Yukio TakeshimaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Nobutaka HorieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Kazuhiko SugiyamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Neuro-oncology Program, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe so-called radiation-induced glioma (RIG, a secondary glioma after cranial irradiation), is a serious late effect after cranial radiation therapy. The clinical characteristics of and ideal treatment for these tumors are unclear. We analyzed our case series and conducted a comprehensive literature review to reveal the precise characteristics of RIGs.

methodsWe analyzed the cases of six patients with RIGs treated at our institution and 354 patients with RIGs from the literature. The latency period from irradiation to the development of each RIG and the median overall survival of the patients were subjected to Kaplan-Meier analyses. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between age at irradiation and the latency period.

resultsThe mean age of the 360 patients at the development of RIG was 27.42 ± 17.87 years. The mean latency period was 11.35 ± 8.58 years. Multiple gliomas were observed in 28.4%. WHO grade 3 and 4 RIGs accounted for 93.3%. The latency periods were significant shorter in the higher WHO grade group (p = 0.0366) and the concomitant systemic chemotherapy group (p < 0.0001). Age at irradiation was negatively associated with the latency period (r =- 0.2287, p = 0.0219). The patients treated with radiotherapy achieved significantly longer survival compared to those treated without radiotherapy (p = 0.0011).

conclusionsDevelopment in younger age, multiplicity, and high incidence of grade 3 and 4 are the clinical characteristics of RIGs. Cranial irradiation at older ages and concomitant chemotherapy were associated with shorter latency for the development of RIG. Radiation therapy may be the feasible treatment option despite radiation-induced gliomas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation OncologyAdolescentAdultChildCranial IrradiationHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultGlioblastomaGliomaRadiation-inducedSecondary neoplasm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.