ArticleScientific reports2022
Histopathological evaluation of a retinoic acid eluting stent in a rabbit iliac artery model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic stiffness enables stage-specific properties mediating functional endothelialization on vascular implants.Science advances · 2026Article
- Recent advances in surface functionalization of cardiovascular stents.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- The Effect of Retinoids in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: From Phenotyping Switching to Proliferation and Migration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of innovative retinoic acid (RA) eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymer. Sixty stents divided in ten groups were implanted in the iliac arteries of 30 rabbits. Two polymers ("A", poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) and "B", polylactic acid), and three doses ("Low", "Medium" and "High") of RA (groups: AL, AM, AH, BL, BM, BH) were used on cobalt chromium stents (Rontis Corporation), one group of bare stent (C), one group (D) of Everolimus eluting stent (Xience-Pro, Abbot Vascular), and two groups of Rontis Everolimus eluting stents coated with polymer A (EA) and B (EB). Treated arteries were explanted after 4 weeks, processed by methyl methacrylate resin and evaluated by histopathology. None of the implanted stents was related with thrombus formation or extensive inflammation. Image analysis showed limited differences between groups regarding area stenosis (BH, D and EB groups had the lower values). Group BH had lower intimal mean thickness than AH (105.1 vs 75.3 μm, p = 0.024). Stents eluting RA, a non-cytotoxic drug, were not related with thrombus formation and had an acceptable degree of stenosis 4 weeks post implantation. RA dose and type of polymer may play role in the biocompatibility of the stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.