Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922457›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Identifying neurocognitive disorder using vector representation of free conversation.

Toshiro Horigome, Kimihiro Hino, Hiroyoshi Toyoshiba, Norihisa Shindo, Kei Funaki, Yoko Eguchi, Momoko Kitazawa, Takanori Fujita, Masaru Mimura, Taishiro Kishimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applications of artificial intelligence in dementia.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Toshiro HorigomeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kimihiro HinoLifescience AI Business Division, Research Development Department, FRONTEO Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyoshi ToyoshibaLifescience AI Business Division, Research Development Department, FRONTEO Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Norihisa ShindoLifescience AI Business Division, Research Development Department, FRONTEO Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei FunakiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoko EguchiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Momoko KitazawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takanori FujitaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru MimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taishiro KishimotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. tkishimoto@keio.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, studies on the use of natural language processing (NLP) approaches to identify dementia have been reported. Most of these studies used picture description tasks or other similar tasks to encourage spontaneous speech, but the use of free conversation without requiring a task might be easier to perform in a clinical setting. Moreover, free conversation is unlikely to induce a learning effect. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning model to discriminate subjects with and without dementia by extracting features from unstructured free conversation data using NLP. We recruited patients who visited a specialized outpatient clinic for dementia and healthy volunteers. Participants' conversation was transcribed and the text data was decomposed from natural sentences into morphemes by performing a morphological analysis using NLP, and then converted into real-valued vectors that were used as features for machine learning. A total of 432 datasets were used, and the resulting machine learning model classified the data for dementia and non-dementia subjects with an accuracy of 0.900, sensitivity of 0.881, and a specificity of 0.916. Using sentence vector information, it was possible to develop a machine-learning algorithm capable of discriminating dementia from non-dementia subjects with a high accuracy based on free conversation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsHumansLanguageNeurocognitive Disorders

Identifiers

PMID35922457
PMCPMC9349220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.