Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922452›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A time-series approach to mapping livestock density using household survey data.

Julianne Meisner, Agapitus Kato, Marshall Lemerani, Erick Mwamba Miaka, Acaga Taban Ismail, Jonathan Wakefield, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, David Pigott, Jonathan Mayer, Peter Rabinowitz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Julianne MeisnerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Center for One Health Research, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA. meisnerj@uw.edu.
Agapitus Kato *Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Marshall Lemerani *Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Erick Mwamba Miaka *Programme National de Lutte contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Acaga Taban Ismail *IntraHealth International, Juba, South Sudan.
Jonathan WakefieldDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
Ali Rowhani-RahbarDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
David PigottDepartment of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
Jonathan MayerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
Peter RabinowitzDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Center for One Health Research, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
University of Washington · USMinistry of Health · MWProgramme National Multisectoriel de Lutte contre le sida · CDUganda Virus Research Institute · UG

Funding

Biostatistics, Epidemiologic & Bioinformatic Training in Environmental HealthT32ES015459 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI June T. Spector · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES015459NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES015459-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than one billion people rely on livestock for income, nutrition, and social cohesion, however livestock keeping can facilitate disease transmission and contribute to climate change. While data on the distribution of livestock have broad utility across a range of applications, efforts to map the distribution of livestock on a large scale are limited to the Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW) project. We present a complimentary effort to map the distribution of cattle and pigs in Malawi, Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo, and South Sudan. In contrast to GLW, which uses dasymmetric modeling applied to census data to produce time-stratified estimates of livestock counts and spatial density, our work uses complex survey data and distinct modeling methods to generate a time-series of livestock distribution, defining livestock density as the ratio of animals to humans. In addition to favorable cross-validation results and general agreement with national density estimates derived from external data on national human and livestock populations, our results demonstrate extremely good agreement with GLW-3 estimates, supporting the validity of both efforts. Our results furthermore offer a high-resolution time series result and employ a definition of density which is particularly well-suited to the study of livestock-origin zoonoses.

Indexed as

IncomeLivestockAnimalsCattleHumansResearch DesignSwineTime FactorsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID35922452
PMCPMC9349298
OpenAlexW4289544501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.