ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2022
Deep-Learning-Based Ultrasound Sound-Speed Tomography Reconstruction with Tikhonov Pseudo-Inverse Priori.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-Based Tomographic Imaging Reconstruction and Synthesis Methods: a Scoping Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Neural networks for faster laser ultrasound tomography in tissue phantoms.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Spatial and channel attention-based conditional Wasserstein GAN for direct and rapid image reconstruction in ultrasound computed tomography.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound sound-speed tomography (USST) is a promising technology for breast imaging and breast cancer detection. Its reconstruction is a complex non-linear mapping from the projection data to the sound-speed image (SSI). The traditional reconstruction methods include mainly the ray-based methods and the waveform-based methods. The ray-based methods with linear approximation have low computational cost but low reconstruction quality; the full wave-based methods with the complex non-linear model have high quality but high cost. To achieve both high quality and low cost, we introduced traditional linear approximation as prior knowledge into a deep neural network and treated the complex non-linear mapping of USST reconstruction as a combination of linear mapping and non-linear mapping. In the proposed method, the linear mapping was seamlessly implemented with a fully connected layer and initialized using the Tikhonov pseudo-inverse matrix. The non-linear mapping was implemented using a U-shape Net (U-Net). Furthermore, we proposed the Tikhonov U-shape net (TU-Net), in which the linear mapping was done before the non-linear mapping, and the U-shape Tikhonov net (UT-Net), in which the non-linear mapping was done before the linear mapping. Moreover, we conducted simulations and experiments for evaluation. In the numerical simulation, the root-mean-squared error was 6.49 and 4.29 m/s for the UT-Net and TU-Net, the peak signal-to-noise ratio was 49.01 and 52.90 dB, the structural similarity was 0.9436 and 0.9761 and the reconstruction time was 10.8 and 11.3 ms, respectively. In this study, the SSIs obtained with the proposed methods exhibited high sound-speed accuracy. Both the UT-Net and the TU-Net achieved high quality and low computational cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.