Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922107›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Enhanced women's decision-making power after the

Md Ahshanul Haque, Nuzhat Choudhury, S M Tanvir Ahmed, Fahmida Dil Farzana, Mohammad Ali, Farina Naz, Towfida Jahan Siddiqua, Mohammad Jyoti Raihan, Sheikh Shahed Rahman, A S G Faruque and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Md Ahshanul HaqueNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3452-8367
Nuzhat ChoudhuryNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh nuzhat@icddrb.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-5278
S M Tanvir AhmedChild Poverty Sector, Save the Children Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fahmida Dil FarzanaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad AliNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farina NazNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Towfida Jahan SiddiquaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Jyoti RaihanNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sheikh Shahed RahmanChild Poverty Sector, Save the Children Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
A S G FaruqueNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8343-4653
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-7439
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDSave the Children · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWomen's decision-making power is a dimension of empowerment and is crucial for better physical and psychosocial outcomes of mothers. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe evaluation design was a cluster randomised pre-post design with two cross-sectional surveys conducted among beneficiary women with at least one child aged <23 months from randomly selected poor or very poor beneficiary households in Sylhet division. OUTCOME MEASURE: Decision-making indicators included food purchases, major household purchases, food preparation, children's healthcare as well as women's own healthcare and visiting family and relatives.

resultsOur findings suggest that 45% of women were able to make decisions on food purchases, 25% on major household purchases, 78% on food preparation, 59% on children's healthcare, 51% on their own healthcare and 43% on visiting family and relatives at baseline in the intervention group, whereas the results were almost the same in the control group. In contrast, at the endline survey, the respective proportions were 75%, 56%, 87%, 80%, 77% and 67% in the intervention group, which were significantly improved when compared with the control group. The prevalence of those outcome indicators were 64%, 41%, 80%, 71%, 68% and 56%, respectively, in the control group. As per multiple logistic regression analysis and structural equation modelling, the

conclusionIn terms of food purchases, major household purchases, children's healthcare, their own healthcare and visiting family and relatives, the TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-5d5678361809b.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPower, PsychologicalWomenBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFoodHumansInfantRural Populationepidemiologypublic healthquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35922107
PMCPMC9352997
OpenAlexW4289596931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.