Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922100›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta variants in a matched test-negative case-control study among US veterans.

Yinong Young-Xu, Gabrielle M Zwain, Hector S Izurieta, Caroline Korves, Ethan I Powell, Jeremy Smith, Abirami Balajee, Mark Holodniy, David O Beenhouwer, Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yinong Young-XuWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vermont, USA Yinong.Young-Xu@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-2440-3352
Gabrielle M ZwainWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Hector S IzurietaFood and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, USA.
Caroline KorvesWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Ethan I PowellWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Jeremy SmithWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Abirami BalajeeWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Mark HolodniyVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
David O BeenhouwerVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Maria C Rodriguez-BarradasMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sheldon T BrownDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Vincent C MarconiDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of messenger RNA (mRNA) booster doses during the period of Delta and Omicron variant dominance.

designWe conducted a matched test-negative case-control study to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of three and two doses of mRNA vaccines against infection (regardless of symptoms) and against COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death.

settingVeterans Health Administration.

participantsWe used electronic health record data from 114 640 veterans who had a SARS-CoV-2 test during November 2021-January 2022. Patients were largely 65 years or older (52%), male (88%) and non-Hispanic white (59%).

main outcome measuresFirst positive result for a SARS-CoV-2 PCR or antigen test.

resultsAgainst infection, booster doses had higher estimated VE (64%, 95% CI 63 to 65) than two-dose vaccination (12%, 95% CI 10 to 15) during the Omicron period. For the Delta period, the VE against infection was 90% (95% CI 88 to 92) among boosted vaccinees, higher than the VE among two-dose vaccinees (54%, 95% CI 50 to 57). Against hospitalisation, booster dose VE was 89% (95% CI 88 to 91) during Omicron and 94% (95% CI 90 to 96) during Delta; two-dose VE was 63% (95% CI 58 to 67) during Omicron and 75% (95% CI 69 to 80) during Delta. Against death, the VE with a booster dose was 94% (95% CI 90 to 96) during Omicron and 96% (95% CI 87 to 99) during Delta.

conclusionsAmong an older, mostly male, population with comorbidities, we found that an mRNA vaccine booster was highly effective against infection, hospitalisation and death. Although the effectiveness of booster vaccination against infection was moderately higher against Delta than against the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant, effectiveness against severe disease and death was similarly high against both variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19VeteransCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMalemRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, Syntheticepidemiologyimmunologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35922100
PMCPMC9352567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.