Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922091›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Understanding the factors influencing the implementation of accreditation in Jordanian Hospitals: the nurses' view.

Abdullah Algunmeeyn, Majd T Mrayyan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdullah AlgunmeeynAdvanced Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Isra University, Amman, Jordan abdullahalgunmeeyn@iu.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-6393-3022
Majd T MrayyanProfessor and Consultant of Nursing, Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-4976
Hashemite University · JOIsra University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccreditation practices are influenced by many variables, resulting in positive outcomes, such as enhanced motivation among the hospital staff. Motivation among the physician and nurses directly impacts the service quality of the hospitals. Accreditation increases organisational capacity, which may improve hospitals' overall performance. This study aimed at assessing the factors influencing the implementation of accreditation in Jordanian hospitals.

methodThis study employed a qualitative approach. As a result, 40 nurses were recruited from two public hospitals with varying experience and specialties. Data were gathered through face-to-face interviews. Interviews were conducted with a total of 40 hospital nurses, who were selected based on convenience and purposeful sampling.

resultsCommunication, recruiting qualified and effective hospital directors, patient involvement and engagement and teamwork influenced the implementation of accreditation in Jordanian hospitals.

conclusionThe implementation of the accreditation process is influenced by many factors. Therefore, focusing more on these factors while using the views and experiences of nurses involved in this process will significantly impact the implementation of the accreditation process in various clinical settings, particularly hospitals.

Indexed as

AccreditationNursesCommunicationHospitals, PublicHumansJordanaccreditationallied health occupationsclinical decision-makingconsumer health informationdecision making

Identifiers

PMID35922091
PMCPMC9352984
OpenAlexW4289596939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.