Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35922077›Full record

ArticleRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2022

Cooled and traditional thermal radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee pain: a comparative outcomes analysis.

Bernie P Wu, Daniel Grits, Victor Foorsov, Jijun Xu, Pavan Tankha, Robert B Bolash

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bernie P WuCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA wup@ccf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8112-8959
Daniel GritsCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Victor FoorsovDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery/Regional Medical Group, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jijun XuDepartment of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5137-8199
Pavan TankhaCenter for Comprehensive Pain Recovery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Robert B BolashDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USNorthwestern Medicine · US

Funding

Complement in Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathyK08CA228039 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI XU, JIJUN · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA228039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGenicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is a minimally invasive intervention for patients with chronic knee pain (CKP) not responding to conservative treatments. Few investigations have compared treatment outcomes of cooled-RFA (c-RFA) and thermal-RFA (t-RFA), two common approaches of GNRFA. This study aims to investigate and compare outcomes, including probability of treatment success, between c-RFA and t-RFA in patients with CKP.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed a total of 208 propensity score matched patients, including 104 patients who received c-RFA and 104 patients who received t-RFA. The primary outcome was probability of pain relief after the procedure, defined as reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score of 2 or greater. The secondary outcomes were degree of NRS pain score reductions, duration of relief, and the probability of patients receiving TKA within 1 year of treatment.

resultsT-RFA was associated with a higher probability of pain relief within 1, 3, and 6 months after procedure when compared with c-RFA. Probabilities of pain relief from t-RFA and c-RFA were 62% (95% CI 51% to 71%) and 43% (95% CI 34% to 53%; p=0.01) within 1 month, 78% (95% CI 68% to 85%) and 55% (95% CI 45% to 64%; p<0.001) within 3 months, and 79% (95% CI 70% to 86%) and 59% (95% CI 49% to 68%; p<0.01) within 6 months, respectively. t-RFA was also associated with greater mean NRS pain score reduction at 1 month after procedure: -4.71 (95% CI -5.3 to -4.1) when compared with -3.59 (95% CI -4.3 to -2.9; p=0.02) from c-RFA. T-RFA and c-RFA were comparable in pain score reduction at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after procedure. Both groups demonstrated comparable duration of relief and probability of patients receiving TKA within 1 year. DISCUSSION: Both t-RFA and c-RFA effectively reduced NRS pain scores in most patients with CKP within the 1 year follow-up period. Genicular nerve t-RFA was associated with a higher probability of treatment success and a greater degree of pain relief at 1 month after the procedure when compared with c-RFA in propensity score matched patients with CKP.

Indexed as

chronic painlower extremityoutcomespain managementtechnology

Identifiers

PMID35922077
PMCPMC9895122
OpenAlexW4289594203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.