Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35921434›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension.

Micha Heilbron, Kristijan Armeni, Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen, Peter Hagoort, Floris P de Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Infant Cortical Tracking of Speech Shows Emerging Spatial Release from Masking in the First Year of Life.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Micha HeilbronDonders Institute, Radboud University, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3039-4007
Kristijan ArmeniDonders Institute, Radboud University, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Mathijs SchoffelenDonders Institute, Radboud University, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0923-6610
Peter HagoortDonders Institute, Radboud University, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-7549
Floris P de LangeDonders Institute, Radboud University, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6730-1452

Funding

European Research Council 101000942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding spoken language requires transforming ambiguous acoustic streams into a hierarchy of representations, from phonemes to meaning. It has been suggested that the brain uses prediction to guide the interpretation of incoming input. However, the role of prediction in language processing remains disputed, with disagreement about both the ubiquity and representational nature of predictions. Here, we address both issues by analyzing brain recordings of participants listening to audiobooks, and using a deep neural network (GPT-2) to precisely quantify contextual predictions. First, we establish that brain responses to words are modulated by ubiquitous predictions. Next, we disentangle model-based predictions into distinct dimensions, revealing dissociable neural signatures of predictions about syntactic category (parts of speech), phonemes, and semantics. Finally, we show that high-level (word) predictions inform low-level (phoneme) predictions, supporting hierarchical predictive processing. Together, these results underscore the ubiquity of prediction in language processing, showing that the brain spontaneously predicts upcoming language at multiple levels of abstraction.

Indexed as

BrainComprehensionLanguageSpeech PerceptionHumansLinguisticsNeural Networks, ComputerSemanticscomputational modelingEEGlanguageMEGprediction

Identifiers

PMID35921434
PMCPMC9371745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.