Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35921386›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2022

Ankle joint distraction is a promising alternative treatment for patients with severe haemophilic ankle arthropathy.

Eline D P van Bergen, Simon C Mastbergen, H Charles Vogely, Tanya N Balani, Piet de Kleijn, Wouter Foppen, Peter M van Roermund, Floris P J G Lafeber, Roger E G Schutgens, Lize F D van Vulpen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ankle joint distraction is a promising alternative treatment for patients with severe haemophilic ankle arthropathy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eline D P van BergenCenter for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University, Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Van Creveldkliniek, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-4566
Simon C MastbergenDepartment, of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H Charles VogelyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tanya N BalaniDepartment, of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Piet de KleijnCenter for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University, Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Van Creveldkliniek, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter FoppenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-8555
Peter M van RoermundDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Floris P J G LafeberDepartment, of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roger E G SchutgensCenter for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University, Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Van Creveldkliniek, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-6033
Lize F D van VulpenCenter for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, University, Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Van Creveldkliniek, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-5524
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

CSL Behring unrestricted grantWFH Clinical Research Grant Program 2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHaemophilic ankle arthropathy (HAA) causes major morbidity. When conservative treatment fails, major surgical interventions are indicated. An alternative treatment to maintain joint mobility and postpone these interventions is desired.

aimTo gather prospective data on clinical/structural changes after ankle joint distraction (AJD) in HAA.

methodsThis study includes patients with severe HAA insufficiently responding to conservative treatment. AJD was performed during 8-10 weeks by use of an external frame. Questionnaires, physical examination and radiology were used to evaluate pain, function and structural changes before and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after distraction. Mixed effect models were used for analysis.

resultsThis study includes eight cases (21-53 years). The fixed effects estimates of the visual analogue score (0-10) improved from 7.5 at baseline to 3.4 (p = .023) 3 years after distraction. The Haemophilia Activities List (HAL, 0-100) for basic/complex lower extremities functions improved from respectively 29.6 and 31.5 to 54.3 (p = .015) and 50.7 (p = .031). Joint mobility was maintained. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed thickened cartilage and reduced bone marrow oedema and subchondral cysts. Pin tract infections (n = 6) were effectively treated and no adverse bleeding events occurred. At 3-year follow-up, in none of the patients the originally indicated arthrodesis was performed.

conclusionThis first prospective study showed that AJD in HAA results in decreased pain, improved function and decreased arthropathy-related MRI findings in the majority of patients for prolonged time. Although the study population is small and follow-up is relatively short, AJD may be promising to postpone invalidating interventions and might be a breakthrough treatment.

Indexed as

ArthritisHemophilia AAnkleAnkle JointHemarthrosisHumansLower ExtremityPainProspective Studiesanklearthroplastyhaemophiliajoint disease

Identifiers

PMID35921386
PMCPMC9804549
OpenAlexW4289637488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.