ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Neural networks for self-adjusting mutation rate estimation when the recombination rate is unknown.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.Genetics · 2026Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid ancient human admixture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Assessing simulation-based supervised machine learning for demographic parameter inference from genomic data.Heredity · 2025Article
- Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Interpreting generative adversarial networks to infer natural selection from genetic data.Genetics · 2024Article
- Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Domain-adaptive neural networks improve supervised machine learning based on simulated population genetic data.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Inference of Coalescence Times and Variant Ages Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- INTERPRETING GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORKS TO INFER NATURAL SELECTION FROM GENETIC DATA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- dnadna: a deep learning framework for population genetics inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating the mutation rate, or equivalently effective population size, is a common task in population genetics. If recombination is low or high, optimal linear estimation methods are known and well understood. For intermediate recombination rates, the calculation of optimal estimators is more challenging. As an alternative to model-based estimation, neural networks and other machine learning tools could help to develop good estimators in these involved scenarios. However, if no benchmark is available it is difficult to assess how well suited these tools are for different applications in population genetics. Here we investigate feedforward neural networks for the estimation of the mutation rate based on the site frequency spectrum and compare their performance with model-based estimators. For this we use the model-based estimators introduced by Fu, Futschik et al., and Watterson that minimize the variance or mean squared error for no and free recombination. We find that neural networks reproduce these estimators if provided with the appropriate features and training sets. Remarkably, using the model-based estimators to adjust the weights of the training data, only one hidden layer is necessary to obtain a single estimator that performs almost as well as model-based estimators for low and high recombination rates, and at the same time provides a superior estimation method for intermediate recombination rates. We apply the method to simulated data based on the human chromosome 2 recombination map, highlighting its robustness in a realistic setting where local recombination rates vary and/or are unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.