Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35921376›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Neural networks for self-adjusting mutation rate estimation when the recombination rate is unknown.

Klara Elisabeth Burger, Peter Pfaffelhuber, Franz Baumdicker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deep Learning in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klara Elisabeth BurgerCluster of Excellence "Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter PfaffelhuberDepartment of Mathematical Stochastics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Franz BaumdickerCluster of Excellence "Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-7259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating the mutation rate, or equivalently effective population size, is a common task in population genetics. If recombination is low or high, optimal linear estimation methods are known and well understood. For intermediate recombination rates, the calculation of optimal estimators is more challenging. As an alternative to model-based estimation, neural networks and other machine learning tools could help to develop good estimators in these involved scenarios. However, if no benchmark is available it is difficult to assess how well suited these tools are for different applications in population genetics. Here we investigate feedforward neural networks for the estimation of the mutation rate based on the site frequency spectrum and compare their performance with model-based estimators. For this we use the model-based estimators introduced by Fu, Futschik et al., and Watterson that minimize the variance or mean squared error for no and free recombination. We find that neural networks reproduce these estimators if provided with the appropriate features and training sets. Remarkably, using the model-based estimators to adjust the weights of the training data, only one hidden layer is necessary to obtain a single estimator that performs almost as well as model-based estimators for low and high recombination rates, and at the same time provides a superior estimation method for intermediate recombination rates. We apply the method to simulated data based on the human chromosome 2 recombination map, highlighting its robustness in a realistic setting where local recombination rates vary and/or are unknown.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationMutation RateComputer SimulationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID35921376
PMCPMC9377634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.