Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35921329›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Onchocerciasis: Target product profiles of in vitro diagnostics to support onchocerciasis elimination mapping and mass drug administration stopping decisions.

Marco A Biamonte, Paul T Cantey, Yaya I Coulibaly, Katherine M Gass, Louise C Hamill, Christopher Hanna, Patrick J Lammie, Joseph Kamgno, Thomas B Nutman, David W Oguttu and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Novel BiplexDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Procedure for Handling and Storage ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marco A BiamonteDrugs & Diagnostics for Tropical Diseases, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6870-6283
Paul T CanteyDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Yaya I CoulibalyMali International Center for Excellence in Research, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, Bamako, Mali, Dermatology Hospital of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Katherine M GassNeglected Tropical Diseases Support Center, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America.
Louise C HamillSightsavers, Haywards Heath, United Kingdom.
Christopher HannaGlobal Project Partners, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Patrick J LammieNeglected Tropical Diseases Support Center, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America.
Joseph KamgnoCentre for Research on Filariasis and other Tropical Diseases, Yaoundé, Cameroon, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Thomas B NutmanLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
David W OguttuVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Dieudonné P SankaraDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Wilma A StolkDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Thomas R UnnaschGlobal Health Infectious Disease Research Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.

Funding

Clinical And Therapeutic Studies Of Human Filariasis and Related DiseasesZIAAI000439 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI NUTMAN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$14.8M
World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO), recognizing the need for new diagnostics to support the control and elimination of onchocerciasis, published the target product profiles (TPPs) of new tests that would support the two most immediate needs: (a) mapping onchocerciasis in areas of low prevalence and (b) deciding when to stop mass drug administration programs. In both instances, the test should ideally detect an antigen specific for live, adult O. volvulus female worms. The preferred format is a field-deployable rapid test. For mapping, the test needs to be ≥ 60% sensitive and ≥ 99.8% specific, while to support stopping decisions, the test must be ≥ 89% sensitive and ≥ 99.8% specific. The requirement for extremely high specificity is dictated by the need to detect with sufficient statistical confidence the low seroprevalence threshold set by WHO. Surveys designed to detect a 1-2% prevalence of a given biomarker, as is the case here, cannot tolerate more than 0.2% of false-positives. Otherwise, the background noise would drown out the signal. It is recognized that reaching and demonstrating such a stringent specificity criterion will be challenging, but test developers can expect to be assisted by national governments and implementing partners for adequately powered field validation.

Indexed as

Onchocerca volvulusOnchocerciasisAnimalsFemaleIvermectinMass Drug AdministrationPrevalenceSeroepidemiologic StudiesWorld Health OrganizationIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID35921329
PMCPMC9377578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.