Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35921304›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Impairments in learning and memory performances associated with nicotinic receptor expression in the honeybee Apis mellifera after exposure to a sublethal dose of sulfoxaflor.

Alison Cartereau, Xavier Pineau, Jacques Lebreton, Monique Mathé-Allainmat, Emiliane Taillebois, Steeve H Thany

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alison CartereauLaboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures (LBLGC) USC INRAE 1328, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-1880
Xavier PineauLaboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures (LBLGC) USC INRAE 1328, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Jacques LebretonCEISAM UMR CNRS 6230, UFR des Sciences et des Techniques, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Monique Mathé-AllainmatCEISAM UMR CNRS 6230, UFR des Sciences et des Techniques, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Emiliane TailleboisLaboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures (LBLGC) USC INRAE 1328, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1675-9196
Steeve H ThanyLaboratoire de Biologie des Ligneux et des Grandes Cultures (LBLGC) USC INRAE 1328, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4333-177X
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfoxaflor is a new insecticide which acts on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChRs) in a similar way to neonicotinoids. However, sufloxaflor (SFX) is thought to act in a different manner and is thus proposed as an alternative in crop protection. The goal of this study is to evaluate the toxicity of SFX and its sublethal effect on the honeybee Apis mellifera after acute exposure. In toxicological assay studies, the LD50 value and sublethal dose (corresponding to the NOEL: no observed effect level) were 96 and 15 ng/bee, respectively. Using the proboscis extension response paradigm, we found that an SFX dose of 15 ng/bee significantly impairs learning and memory retrieval when applied 12 h before conditioning or 24 h after olfactory conditioning. SFX had no effect on honeybee olfactory performance when exposure happened after the conditioning. Relative quantitative PCR experiments performed on the six nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits demonstrated that they are differently expressed in the honeybee brain after SFX exposure, whether before or after conditioning. We found that intoxicated bees with learning defects showed a strong expression of the Amelβ1 subunit. They displayed overexpression of Amelα9 and Amelβ2, and down-regulation of Amelα1, Amelα3 and Amelα7 subunits. These results demonstrated for the first time that a sublethal dose of SFX could affect honeybee learning and memory performance and modulate the expression of specific nAChR subunits in the brain.

Indexed as

InsecticidesReceptors, NicotinicAnimalsBeesLearningNeonicotinoidsPyridinesSulfur CompoundsInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPyridinesReceptors, NicotinicsulfoxaflorSulfur Compounds

Identifiers

PMID35921304
PMCPMC9348702
OpenAlexW4289637505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.