Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920958›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2022

Comparative analysis of the survival and regeneration potential of juvenile and matured earthworm, Eudrilus eugeniae, upon in vivo and in vitro maintenance.

Kamarajan Rajagopalan, Jackson Durairaj Selvan Christyraj, Karthikeyan Subbiahanadar Chelladurai, Jemima Kamalapriya John Samuel Gnanaraja, Johnson Retnaraj Samuel Selvan Christyraj

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kamarajan RajagopalanRegeneration and Stem Cell Biology Lab, Centre for Molecular and Nanomedical Sciences, International Research Centre, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 621306, India.
Jackson Durairaj Selvan ChristyrajRegeneration and Stem Cell Biology Lab, Centre for Molecular and Nanomedical Sciences, International Research Centre, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 621306, India. jacksondurairaj@sathyabama.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-0529
Karthikeyan Subbiahanadar ChelladuraiRegeneration and Stem Cell Biology Lab, Centre for Molecular and Nanomedical Sciences, International Research Centre, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 621306, India.
Jemima Kamalapriya John Samuel GnanarajaDepartment of Biotechnology, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Johnson Retnaraj Samuel Selvan ChristyrajRegeneration and Stem Cell Biology Lab, Centre for Molecular and Nanomedical Sciences, International Research Centre, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 621306, India. johnnbt@sathyabama.ac.in.
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology · INPurdue University West Lafayette · USVel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

DST-SERB ECR/2016/000956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eudrilus eugeniae is a clitellum-dependent earthworm that requires intact clitellum segments for its survival and regeneration. The present study aims to interconnect the survival and regeneration ability that varies between in vivo and in vitro maintenance upon different sites of amputation. The amputated portion of the worm that possesses intact clitellum (13th-18th segments) survived and had the potential to regenerate, whereas worms with partial or without clitellum segments only survived and were unable to regenerate. Besides segment length and clitellum segments, clitellum factors also determined the survival, blastemal initiation and differentiation potential. The survivability and regeneration potential of worms were augmented upon in vitro maintenance. Notably, the amputated segments (1st-10th segments) and posterior segments of similar length, which usually die within the 4th day in vivo, survived for more than 60 days in vitro but lacked the regeneration ability. On the other hand, the amputated posterior segments (30th to 37th segments) from juvenile worms, maintained in in vitro condition, survived and initiated blastema with multiple buds but lacked the ability to regenerate. Interestingly, the equal half of adult worm blastema that is maintained in in vitro conditions were able to form the blastema-like structure with the help of a unique stick. The anterior blastema failed to retain the regenerative structure but the posterior portion of the amputated blastema, which is also associated with a small portion of the body segment, showed the ability to retain the regenerative structure. Our results conclude that the survivability is enhanced upon in vitro maintenance and this condition favours the adult dedifferentiated blastemal and stem cell-enriched juvenile posterior segments to form a regenerative blastema.

Indexed as

OligochaetaAnimalsCell DifferentiationStem CellsClitellumEudrilus eugeniaeIn vitro maintenanceRegeneration abilitySurvivability

Identifiers

PMID35920958
OpenAlexW4289595464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.