Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920945›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2022

Cervical spinal cord stimulation for prevention and treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical and radiographic outcomes of a prospective single-center clinical pilot study.

Konstantin V Slavin, Prasad Vannemreddy

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00766844 phase1completednot on this map

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Prevention of Cerebral Vasospasm Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using MTS Trial System 3510

TypeinterventionalSponsorKonstantin V. SlavinRan2008 to 2009Enrolled12ConditionsAneurysmal Subarachnoid HemorrhageArmsspinal cord stimulation
NCT07131696 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) on Cerebral Vasospasm Secondary to Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarshall HollandRan2026 to 2029Enrolled10ConditionsAneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Vasospasm, Cerebral, Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tVNS), Endovascular TreatmentArmsTranscutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Konstantin V SlavinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. kslavin@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-8639
Prasad VannemreddyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral vasospasm induced by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a major cause of high morbidity and mortality, for which there is no consistently effective treatment. Cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) has been shown to induce vasodilatation and improve peripheral and cerebral blood flow in both animal and human studies. This pilot study was performed to assess the clinical effect and long-term results of cSCS treatment in aSAH patients.

methodsThis was the first IRB- and US FDA-approved prospective non-randomized non-controlled study comprising of 12 aSAH patients (8 women, 4 men, age range 34-62 years) treated between May and November 2008. All patients underwent up to 2 weeks of cSCS with a single percutaneously implanted 8-contact electrode. Neurological outcomes at discharge and follow-up of up to 13 years and mortality/complications rates were analyzed.

resultsAll 12 aSAH patients underwent cSCS electrode implantation immediately after securing the aneurysm. Patients were stimulated for 10-14 consecutive days starting within 3 days of aneurysm rupture. Angiographic vasospasm occurred in six patients; two patients developed new vasospasm-related neurological symptoms; both recovered completely by discharge time. One patient died from unrelated multi-system failure; the rest were followed up clinically (average, 7.5 years; range, 12-151 months) and angiographically (average, 6.5 years; range, 36-125 months). No delayed ischemic neurological deficits/strokes and no cSCS-related adverse effects were observed.

conclusionsOur short- and long-term data suggest that cSCS is feasible and safe for patients in the acute aSAH settings. Small size of the patient cohort and lack of control do not allow us to conclude whether cSCS is able to prevent cerebral vasospasm, decrease its severity, and improve clinical outcomes in aSAH patients. However, our findings support further clinical trials and development of cSCS as a new concept to prevent and treat cerebral vasospasm.

trial registrationCLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT00766844, posted on 10/06/2008.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord StimulationSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesAneurysmCerebral vasospasmSpinal cord stimulationSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.