ArticleNeuroradiology2022
Accelerated 3D T2-weighted images using compressed sensing for pediatric brain imaging.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical Brain MRI Guidelines for Anti-Aβ Antibody Treatment in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Guideline
- Practical brain MRI guidelines for anti-Aβ antibody treatment in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Guideline
- Evaluation of simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging in the diagnosis of brain lesions in pediatric patients: a quantitative and qualitative study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Accelerated magnetic resonance imaging of hippocampal sclerosis in pediatric patients with deep learning-based reconstruction: comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance with conventional reconstruction.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of the 3D T2-weighted images accelerated using conventional method (CAI-SPACE) with the images accelerated using compressed sensing (CS-SPACE) in pediatric brain imaging.
methodsA total of 116 brain MRI (53 with CAI-SPACE and 63 with CS-SPACE) were obtained from children 16 years old or younger. Quantitative image quality was evaluated using the apparent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The sequences were qualitatively evaluated for overall image quality, general artifact, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-related artifact, and grey-white matter differentiation. The two sequences were compared for the total and two age groups (< 24 months vs. ≥ 24 months).
resultsCompressed sensing application in 3D T2-weighted imaging resulted in 8.5% reduction in scanning time. Quantitative image quality analysis showed higher apparent SNR (median [Interquartile range]; 29 [25] vs. 23 [14], P = 0.005) and CNR (0.231 [0.121] vs. 0.165 [0.120], P = 0.027) with CS-SPACE compared to CAI-SPACE. Qualitative image quality analysis showed better image quality with CS-SPACE for general (P = 0.024) and CSF-related artifact (P < 0.001). CSF-related artifacts reduction was prominent in the older age group (≥ 24 months). Overall image quality (P = 0.162) and grey-white matter differentiation (P = 0.397) were comparable between CAI-SPACE and CS-SPACE.
conclusionCompressed sensing application in 3D T2-weighted images modestly reduced acquisition time and lowered CSF-related artifact compared to conventional images of the pediatric brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.