Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920792›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Accounting for population structure in genomic predictions of Eucalyptus globulus.

Andrew N Callister, Matias Bermann, Stephen Elms, Ben P Bradshaw, Daniela Lourenco, Jeremy T Brawner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Indirect Genomic Predictions for Indicine Cattle Breeds With SNP Effects From a Multi-Breed Genomic Evaluation.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Definition of metafounders based on population structure analysis.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew N CallisterTreehouse Forest Research LLC, Check, VA 24072, USA.
Matias BermannDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Stephen ElmsHVP Plantations, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia.
Ben P BradshawAustralian Bluegum Plantations, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jeremy T BrawnerDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
University of Georgia · USTreehouse · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic groups have been widely adopted in tree breeding to account for provenance effects within pedigree-derived relationship matrices. However, provenances or genetic groups have not yet been incorporated into single-step genomic BLUP ("HBLUP") analyses of tree populations. To quantify the impact of accounting for population structure in Eucalyptus globulus, we used HBLUP to compare breeding value predictions from models excluding base population effects and models including either fixed genetic groups or the marker-derived proxies, also known as metafounders. Full-sib families from 2 separate breeding populations were evaluated across 13 sites in the "Green Triangle" region of Australia. Gamma matrices (Γ) describing similarities among metafounders reflected the geographic distribution of populations and the origins of 2 land races were identified. Diagonal elements of Γ provided population diversity or allelic covariation estimates between 0.24 and 0.56. Genetic group solutions were strongly correlated with metafounder solutions across models and metafounder effects influenced the genetic solutions of base population parents. The accuracy, stability, dispersion, and bias of model solutions were compared using the linear regression method. Addition of genomic information increased accuracy from 0.41 to 0.47 and stability from 0.68 to 0.71, while increasing bias slightly. Dispersion was within 0.10 of the ideal value (1.0) for all models. Although inclusion of metafounders did not strongly affect accuracy or stability and had mixed effects on bias, we nevertheless recommend the incorporation of metafounders in prediction models to represent the hierarchical genetic population structure of recently domesticated populations.

Indexed as

EucalyptusGenomeGenomicsGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant Breedingbreeding value accuracycross-validationforest tree breedinggenetic groupsgenomic selectionLR methodmetafoundersMPPMultiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC)Multiparental PopulationsMyrtaceaesingle-step GBLUP

Identifiers

PMID35920792
PMCPMC9434241
OpenAlexW4289711238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.