Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920559›Full record

Observational studyThe oncologist2022

Adherence to Oral Treatments in Older Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer, the ADHERE Study: A Prospective Trial of the Meet-URO Network.

Pasquale Rescigno, Marco Maruzzo, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Veronica Murianni, Marika Cinausero, Helga Lipari, Lucia Fratino, Teresa Gamba, Ugo De Giorgi, Orazio Caffo and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The role of the caregiver in older patients with advanced prostate cancer: results from the ADHERE Prospective Study of the Meet-URO network.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Pasquale RescignoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
Marco MaruzzoMedical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Sara Elena RebuzziMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.
Veronica MurianniMedical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Marika CinauseroDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Helga LipariDivision of Medical Oncology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Lucia FratinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano CRO-IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Teresa GambaMedical Oncology, Mauriziano Hospital,Turin, Italy.
Ugo De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Orazio CaffoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Davide BimbattiMedical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Arianna DriDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Alessandra MoscaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
Emilio Francesco GiuntaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
Paola ErmacoraDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Francesca VignaniMedical Oncology, Mauriziano Hospital,Turin, Italy.
Aichi MsakiMedical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Barbara BonifacioDepartment of Oncology, ASUFC Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
Valentina LombardoDivision of Medical Oncology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Vincenza ConteducaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy.
Umberto BassoMedical Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Giuseppe FornariniMedical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Giuseppe Luigi BannaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0764-3650
Candiolo Cancer Institute · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors for prostate cancer (PC) impose the burden of self-administration on older patients overwhelmed by the requirement of many other concomitant medications. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study evaluated the proportion of non-adherence in a 12-month follow-up period and the first 3 months to abiraterone (ABI) or enzalutamide (ENZ). In a prospective multicenter observational cohort study, patients with metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) aged ≥70 years receiving ABI or ENZ pre- or post-docetaxel were enrolled. Treatment monitoring included pill counting, a self-assessment questionnaire, and clinical diaries at each clinical visit. Non-adherence rates were based on proportions of missed/prescribed pills ratios by pill counting.

resultsOverall, 234 patients were recruited with median age of 78 years (range, 73-82); 86 (37%) were treated with ABI, and 148 (63%) with ENZ. The median follow-up for adherence was seven monthly cycles (IQR: 4-12). The two cohorts were well balanced for baseline characteristics. The percentage of non-adherence by pill counting was slightly higher for ABI than ENZ (5.2% vs. 4.2%, P < .001). By self-reporting, patients on ENZ tended to report more frequently than those with ABI forgetfulness as the reason for missing events (42% vs. 17%, P < .001). A lower Geriatric G8 score correlated with non-adherence (P = .004). Overall survival (OS) was 48.8 months. Patients on ABI had radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) of 28.4 [24.2-32.5], while for ENZ patients, we reported a median rPFS of 23.1 [18.2-28.1] months.

conclusionPhysicians tend to treat older mCRPC patients with ENZ. Non-adherence rate is relatively low overall but can be higher with ABI than with ENZ and correlates with the Geriatric G8 score. Forgetfulness is a potential barrier for ENZ.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleProspective Studiesabirateroneadherencecomplianceelderlyenzalutamidefrailtypatient-reported outcomeprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35920559
PMCPMC9732238
OpenAlexW4289549815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.