Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920540›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2022

Intention to leave Nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Luciane Prado Kantorski, Michele Mandagará de Oliveira, Poliana Farias Alves, Carlos Alberto Dos Santos Treichel, Carla Gabriela Wünsch, Luiza Hences Dos Santos, Guilherme Emanuel Weiss Pinheiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reasons for leaving or remaining in nursing work and profession: a comparative analysis among emergency/urgent care professionals.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciane Prado KantorskiUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9726-3162
Michele Mandagará de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-9339
Poliana Farias AlvesUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-9536
Carlos Alberto Dos Santos TreichelUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-9108
Carla Gabriela WünschUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Cuiabá, MT, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-1120
Luiza Hences Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-2491
Guilherme Emanuel Weiss PinheiroUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Colégio Politécnico, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-7023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto investigate the percentage of professionals with an intention to leave Nursing during the COVID-10 pandemic, as well as the factors associated with this outcome.

methoda cross-sectional study conducted by applying questionnaires to 890 Nursing professionals from the municipality of Pelotas (RS). The outcome was identified by means of self-reports obtained from the question itself. Relative Risks, as well as their Confidence Intervals (95%), were calculated for the independent variables by means of unadjusted and adjusted Poisson regression.

resultsthe percentage of professionals who stated their intention to leave Nursing was 24.6% (n=219). There was a positive association between the outcome and higher schooling levels, negative evaluation of institutional support, moderate or intense overload, and skin lesions. A negative association was also observed between the outcome and individuals aged 51 years old or more.

conclusionexcept for skin lesions, aspects such as lack of support and overload, although they may have been intensified during the pandemic, do not represent a new fact in the health services. In this sense, the associations found in the study reflect the need for cross-sectional actions to promote retention of professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19Nursing Staff, HospitalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntentionJob SatisfactionMiddle AgedPandemicsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35920540
PMCPMC9342914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.