Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920401›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2022

Experimental testing of fracture fixation plates: A review.

Shiling Zhang, Dharmesh Patel, Mark Brady, Sherri Gambill, Kanthan Theivendran, Subodh Deshmukh, John Swadener, Sarah Junaid, Laura Jane Leslie

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effects of Plate-Bone Contact on Bridge Plate Fracture Fixation Biomechanics: Computational, Experimental, and Analytical Modeling.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiling ZhangAston Institute of Materials Research (AIMR), Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-8143
Dharmesh PatelInvibio Biomaterial Solutions Limited, Hillhouse International, Thornton-Cleveleys, UK.
Mark BradyInvibio Biomaterial Solutions Limited, Hillhouse International, Thornton-Cleveleys, UK.
Sherri GambillInvibio Biomaterial Solutions Limited, Hillhouse International, Thornton-Cleveleys, UK.
Kanthan TheivendranSandwell and West Birmingham Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-3400
Subodh DeshmukhSandwell and West Birmingham Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
John SwadenerAston Institute of Materials Research (AIMR), Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-3461
Sarah JunaidAston Institute of Materials Research (AIMR), Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Laura Jane LeslieAston Institute of Materials Research (AIMR), Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-9589
Aston University · GBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal and its alloys have been predominantly used in fracture fixation for centuries, but new materials such as composites and polymers have begun to see clinical use for fracture fixation during the past couple of decades. Along with the emerging of new materials, tribological issues, especially debris, have become a growing concern for fracture fixation plates. This article for the first time systematically reviews the most recent biomechanical research, with a focus on experimental testing, of those plates within ScienceDirect and PubMed databases. Based on the search criteria, a total of 5449 papers were retrieved, which were then further filtered to exclude nonrelevant, duplicate or non-accessible full article papers. In the end, a total of 83 papers were reviewed. In experimental testing plates, screws and simulated bones or cadaver bones are employed to build a fixation construct in order to test the strength and stability of different plate and screw configurations. The test set-up conditions and conclusions are well documented and summarised here, including fracture gap size, types of bones deployed, as well as the applied load, test speed and test ending criteria. However, research on long term plate usage was very limited. It is also discovered that there is very limited experimental research around the tribological behaviour particularly on the debris' generation, collection and characterisation. In addition, there is no identified standard studying debris of fracture fixation plate. Therefore, the authors suggested the generation of a suite of tribological testing standards on fracture fixation plate and screws in the aim to answer key questions around the debris from fracture fixation plate of new materials or new design and ultimately to provide an insight on how to reduce the risks of debris-related osteolysis, inflammation and aseptic loosening.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesCadaverFracture FixationHumansMaterials Testingbiomaterialsbiomedical devicesdebris characterisationdebris generationfracture fixationfrettingmorphologytrauma plateTribological testingwear loss

Identifiers

PMID35920401
PMCPMC9449446
OpenAlexW4289544940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.