ArticleFaraday discussions2022
Towards sub-millisecond cryo-EM grid preparation.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct deposition on pre-cooled grids: a new approach to sub-millisecond cryoEM grid preparation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- UsingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Microsecond Time-Resolved Cryo-EM Based on Jet Vitrification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Outrunning protein diffusion to the air-water interface in cryoEM.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Foam film vitrification for cryo-EM.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Overcoming the preferred-orientation problem in cryo-EM with self-supervised deep learning.Nature methods · 2025Article
- CryoEM grid preparation: a closer look at advancements and impact of preparation mode and new approaches.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
- Overcoming the preferred orientation problem in cryoEM with self-supervised deep-learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sample preparation is still a significant problem for many single particle cryo-EM workflows and our understanding and developments in the area lag behind that of image processing and microscope design. Over the last few years there has been growing evidence that many of the problems which occur during sample preparation are during the time the sample resides within the thin film created during the conventional blotting process. In parallel, faster grid preparation approaches have been developed for time-resolved cryo-EM experiments allowing for non-equilibrium intermediates to be captured on the ms timescale. Therefore, an important question is how fast can we prepare suitable grids for imaging by cryo-EM and how much does this mitigate the problems observed in sample preparation? Here we use a novel approach which has been developed for time-resolved studies to produce grids on an estimated sub-1 ms timescale. While the method comes with its own challenges, a 3.8 Å reconstruction of apoferritin prepared with the ultrafast method shows that good resolutions can be achieved. Although several orders of magnitude faster than conventional approaches we show using a ribosome sample, that interactions with the air-water interface cannot be avoided with preferred orientations still present. Therefore, the work shows that faster reactions can be captured but poses the question whether speed is the answer to problems with sample preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.