Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920321›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

Robust counterselection and advanced λRed recombineering enable markerless chromosomal integration of large heterologous constructs.

Dmitrii M Bubnov, Tigran V Yuzbashev, Andrey A Khozov, Olga E Melkina, Tatiana V Vybornaya, Guy-Bart Stan, Sergey P Sineoky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DNA-Mimic Antirestriction Proteins ArdA Could Regulate Gene Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A study on L-threonine and L-serine uptake inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitrii M BubnovBioresource Center Russian National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (BRC VKPM), State Research Institute for Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of National Research Center 'Kurchatov Institute' (NRC 'Kurchatov Institute' - GosNIIgenetika), 1-st Dorozhny pr., 1, Moscow 117545, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-1909
Tigran V YuzbashevDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Andrey A KhozovBioresource Center Russian National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (BRC VKPM), State Research Institute for Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of National Research Center 'Kurchatov Institute' (NRC 'Kurchatov Institute' - GosNIIgenetika), 1-st Dorozhny pr., 1, Moscow 117545, Russia.
Olga E MelkinaKurchatov Complex of Genetic Research, NRC 'Kurchatov Institute', Kurchatov Square, 1, Moscow 123098, Russia.
Tatiana V VybornayaBioresource Center Russian National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (BRC VKPM), State Research Institute for Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of National Research Center 'Kurchatov Institute' (NRC 'Kurchatov Institute' - GosNIIgenetika), 1-st Dorozhny pr., 1, Moscow 117545, Russia.
Guy-Bart StanDepartment of Bioengineering and Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Sergey P SineokyBioresource Center Russian National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (BRC VKPM), State Research Institute for Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms of National Research Center 'Kurchatov Institute' (NRC 'Kurchatov Institute' - GosNIIgenetika), 1-st Dorozhny pr., 1, Moscow 117545, Russia.
Kurchatov Institute · RUImperial College London · GBLomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in bacterial genome engineering, delivery of large synthetic constructs remains challenging in practice. In this study, we propose a straightforward and robust approach for the markerless integration of DNA fragments encoding whole metabolic pathways into the genome. This approach relies on the replacement of a counterselection marker with cargo DNA cassettes via λRed recombineering. We employed a counterselection strategy involving a genetic circuit based on the CI repressor of λ phage. Our design ensures elimination of most spontaneous mutants, and thus provides a counterselection stringency close to the maximum possible. We improved the efficiency of integrating long PCR-generated cassettes by exploiting the Ocr antirestriction function of T7 phage, which completely prevents degradation of unmethylated DNA by restriction endonucleases in wild-type bacteria. The employment of highly restrictive counterselection and ocr-assisted λRed recombineering allowed markerless integration of operon-sized cassettes into arbitrary genomic loci of four enterobacterial species with an efficiency of 50-100%. In the case of Escherichia coli, our strategy ensures simple combination of markerless mutations in a single strain via P1 transduction. Overall, the proposed approach can serve as a general tool for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering in a range of bacterial hosts.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage lambdaEscherichia coliDNAGenome, BacterialOperonDNA

Identifiers

PMID35920321
PMCPMC9410887
OpenAlexW4289544752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.