Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920306›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

In with the old, in with the new: machine learning for time to event biomedical research.

Ioana Danciu, Greeshma Agasthya, Janet P Tate, Mayanka Chandra-Shekar, Ian Goethert, Olga S Ovchinnikova, Benjamin H McMahon, Amy C Justice

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ioana DanciuAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-1403
Greeshma AgasthyaAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Janet P TateDepartment of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Mayanka Chandra-ShekarAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Ian GoethertAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Olga S OvchinnikovaAdvanced Computing for Health Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Benjamin H McMahonTheoretical Biology Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Amy C JusticeDepartment of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0139-5502
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USYale University · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration MVP017NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863Veterans Health Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predictive modeling literature for biomedical applications is dominated by biostatistical methods for survival analysis, and more recently some out of the box machine learning approaches. In this article, we show a presentation of a machine learning method appropriate for time-to-event modeling in the area of prostate cancer long-term disease progression. Using XGBoost adapted to long-term disease progression, we developed a predictive model for 118 788 patients with localized prostate cancer at diagnosis from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Our model accounted for patient censoring. Harrell's c-index for our model using only features available at the time of diagnosis was 0.757 95% confidence interval [0.756, 0.757]. Our results show that machine learning methods like XGBoost can be adapted to use accelerated failure time (AFT) with censoring to model long-term risk of disease progression. The long median survival justifies and requires censoring. Overall, we show that an existing machine learning approach can be used for AFT outcome modeling in prostate cancer, and more generally for other chronic diseases with long observation times.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchProstatic NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansMachine LearningMaleSurvival Analysismachine learningpredictive modelingsurvival analysisxgboost

Identifiers

PMID35920306
PMCPMC9471708
OpenAlexW4289545466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.