Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920238›Full record

ReviewArtificial organs2022

Validity and success rate of noninvasive mean arterial blood pressure measurements in cf-LVAD patients: A technical review.

Steven Lankheet, Martijn M Pieterse, Robin Rijnhout, Emma Tuerlings, Anne-Marie C Oppelaar, Linda W van Laake, Faiz Z Ramjankhan, Berend E Westerhof, Marish I F J Oerlemans

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Artificial organs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven LankheetBiomedical Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Martijn M PieterseTechnical Medicine, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Robin RijnhoutTechnical Medicine, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Emma TuerlingsTechnical Medicine, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Anne-Marie C OppelaarDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linda W van LaakeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Faiz Z RamjankhanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Berend E WesterhofDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marish I F J OerlemansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3166-518X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe life expectancy of patients with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) is increasing. Adequate determination and regulation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) is important to prevent adverse events. Given the low pulsatility characteristics in these patients, standard blood pressure equipment is inadequate to monitor MAP and not recommended. We provide an overview of currently available noninvasive techniques, using an extensive search strategy in three online databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar) to find validation studies using invasive intra-arterial blood pressure measurement as a reference. Mean differences with the reference values smaller than 5 ± 8 mm Hg were considered acceptable. OBSERVATIONS: After deduplication, screening, and exclusion of incorrect sources, eleven studies remained with 3139 successful MAP measurements in 386 patients. Four noninvasive techniques, using Doppler, pulse oximetry, finger cuff volume clamp, or slow upper arm cuff deflation, were identified and evaluated for validity and success rate in cf-LVAD patients. Here, a comprehensive technical background of the blood pressure measurement methods is provided in combination with a clinical use comparison. Of the reported noninvasive techniques, slow cuff devices performed most optimally (mean difference 1.3 ± 5.2 mm Hg).

conclusionsOur results are encouraging and indicate that noninvasive blood pressure monitoring options with acceptable validity and success rate are available. Further technical development and validation is warranted for the growing population of patients on long-term cf-LVAD support.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureArterial PressureArteriesBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHumansblood pressureLVADnoninvasive measurementtechnical review

Identifiers

PMID35920238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.