Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920183›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2022

Analysis of CXCL8 and its receptors CXCR1/CXCR2 at the mRNA level in neoplastic tissue, as well as in serum and peritoneal fluid in patients with ovarian cance.

Marta Smycz-Kubańska, Sebastian Stępień, Joanna Magdalena Gola, Celina Kruszniewska-Rajs, Dominika Wendlocha, Patrycja Królewska-Daszczyńska, Anna Strzelec, Jarosław Strzelczyk, Wojciech Szanecki, Andrzej Witek and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Smycz-KubańskaDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Sebastian StępieńDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Joanna Magdalena GolaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Celina Kruszniewska-RajsDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Dominika WendlochaDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Patrycja Królewska-DaszczyńskaDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Anna StrzelecDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Jarosław StrzelczykDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Wojciech SzaneckiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Andrzej WitekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Aleksandra Mielczarek-PalaczDepartment of Immunology and Serology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40‑055 Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between the coexistence of inflammatory and neoplastic processes in ovarian cancer, particularly those involving chemokines and their receptors, may help to elucidate the involvement of the studied parameters in tumor pathogenesis and could lead to improved clinical applications. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze the levels of C‑X‑C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8), and its receptors C‑X‑C chemokine receptor (CXCR)1 and CXCR2, in the serum and peritoneal fluid of women with ovarian cancer, and to evaluate the association between the expression of these parameters in tumor tissue and patient characteristics, particularly the degree of histological differentiation. The study group included women with ovarian cancer diagnosed with serous cystadenocarcinoma International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIc and a control group, which consisted of women who were diagnosed with a benign lesion (serous cystadenoma). The transcript levels of

Indexed as

Interleukin-8Ovarian NeoplasmsReceptors, Interleukin-8AReceptors, Interleukin-8BAscitic FluidFemaleHumansRNA, MessengerInterleukin-8Receptors, Interleukin-8AReceptors, Interleukin-8BRNA, MessengerCXCL8 chemokineCXCR1/CXCR2 receptorsovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID35920183
PMCPMC9435018
OpenAlexW4289522713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.