Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920123›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2022

Operational issues of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Korea.

Na Ahn, Jaehak Park, Sangho Roh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Na AhnLaboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-4928
Jaehak ParkLaboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-4640
Sangho RohSchool of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. sangho@snu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8082-6459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Korean Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is currently facing some operational pressing issues. 1) Review of the animal protocol containing controversial technology. 2) Review of the multi-institution animal protocol. 3) Review of veterinary clinical trials for client-owned animals. 4) Delay the review process in large institutions with a single IACUC. Here, the following three solutions are proposed to address the above issues. 1) Establishment of public IACUC. 2) Establishment of the Veterinary Clinical Study Committee as an advisory body to the IACUC. 3) Operating multiple committees rather than increasing the number of committee members on a single committee.

Indexed as

Animal Care CommitteesAnimalsAnimal WelfareRepublic of KoreaAnimal ethicsanimal protocol reviewanimal welfareclinical trialInstitutional Animal Care and Use Committee

Identifiers

PMID35920123
PMCPMC9346528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.