Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920107›Full record

Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries-Maternal, fetal and sociodemographic risk factors: A retrospective register-based study.

Kristin André, Andrea Stuart, Karin Källén

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The impact of advanced maternal age on the risk of perineal and anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of gestational weight gain on perineal injury and obstetric anal sphincter injury among underweight primiparous women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of fetal viability in perineal and anal sphincter injury: Insights from a large cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin AndréDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsingborg Central Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2703-1953
Andrea StuartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsingborg Central Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5131-6297
Karin KällénInstitution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-2630
Lund University · SEHelsingborgs lasarett · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are severe complications to vaginal births with potentially serious long-term consequences and large impact on quality of life. The aim was to determine risk and protective factors for OASIS. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective register-based observational study. A cohort of 988 988 singleton term deliveries 2005-2016 in Sweden were included. Data from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry and Statistics Sweden were extracted to identify cases of OASIS and maternal and fetal characteristics. Modified Poisson Regression analyses were performed to assess risk factors.

resultsThe rate of OASIS was 3.5% (n = 34 583). Primiparity (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.13, 95% CI 3.05-3.21), vacuum extraction (aRR 2.79, 95% CI 2.73-2.86), forceps (aRR 4.27, 95% CI 3.86-4.72), and high birthweight (aRR 2.61, 95% CI 2.50-2.72) were associated with a significantly increased risk of OASIS. Increasing maternal age and decreasing maternal height also increased the risk of OASIS. Obesity increased the risk of OASIS (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 1.04-1.08), if fetal birthweight was not adjusted for. Smoking (aRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.79) and low maternal education (aRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92) were associated with a decreased frequency of reported OASIS. Previous cesarean section increased the risk of OASIS (aRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.36-1.47).

conclusionsPrimiparity, instrumental delivery, and high birthweight significantly increased the risk of OASIS. Obesity, low height, increasing age, and previous cesarean section also increased the risk whereas smoking and low maternal educational level were associated with a lower OASIS rate.

Indexed as

Obstetric Labor ComplicationsAnal CanalBirth WeightCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansObesityPregnancyQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorslabor complicationsobstetric deliveryobstetric sphincter injuriespelvic floor disorderrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID35920107
PMCPMC9812064
OpenAlexW4289711256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.