Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920037›Full record

Trial reportActa neurologica Scandinavica2022

Cotinine levels influence the risk of rupture of brain aneurysms.

Paolo Missori, Diana Aguiar de Sousa, Angela Ambrosone, Antonio Currà, Sergio Paolini, Giorgio Incarbone, Elena Amabile, Francesco Biraschi, Francesco Diana, Simone Peschillo

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mendelian randomization demonstrates a causal link between peripheral circulating acylcarnitines and intracranial aneurysms.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo MissoriDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-0104
Diana Aguiar de SousaDepartment of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitario Lisboa Norte, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-7924
Angela AmbrosoneDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonio CurràDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Academic Neurology Unit, Ospedale A. Fiorini, Terracina, LT, "Sapienza" University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7945-8342
Sergio PaoliniIRCCS Neuromed-Pozzilli, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio IncarboneDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Elena AmabileDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BiraschiDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Interventional Neuroradiology, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco DianaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-917X
Simone PeschilloUniCamillus International Medical University, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3920-8517
Policlinico Umberto I · ITFondazione Roma · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotinine, the primary metabolite of nicotine, is currently regarded as the best biomarker of tobacco smoke exposure. We aim to assess whether cotinine levels are associated with (1) intracranial aneurysm and (2) intracranial aneurysm rupture.

methodsWe performed a single-center case-control study. Cases were consecutive patients admitted with diagnosis of brain aneurysm (ruptured or unruptured). We randomly selected controls without intracranial aneurysm from the same source population that produced the cases. Smoking data were collected by questionnaire, and serum levels of cotinine were used as an objective measure of nicotine exposure. Logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between cotinine levels and aneurysm rupture.

resultsWe included 86 patients with intracranial aneurysm and 96 controls. Smoking status (p < .001), cotinine levels (p = .009), and female sex (p = .006) were associated with diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm. In the multivariate analysis, controlling for sex, smoker status and age, levels of cotinine were independently associated with aneurysm rupture (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.13, p = .012).

conclusionsOur results suggest that high cotinine levels in smokers with brain aneurysm are significantly associated with high rupture risk, independently of smoker status, age, and sex.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmTobacco Smoke PollutionCase-Control StudiesCotinineFemaleHumansNicotineRisk FactorsCotinineNicotineTobacco Smoke Pollutionaneurysmbraincotininerupturesmoke

Identifiers

PMID35920037
PMCPMC9805191
OpenAlexW4289517926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.