Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920028›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2022

Impact of disease characteristics and knowledge on public risk perception of zoonoses.

Caroline E Spence, Sarah C Jenkins, Magda Osman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Non-vaccinal prophylaxis of tularemia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline E SpenceDepartment of Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9800-5576
Sarah C JenkinsDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-9691
Magda OsmanCentre for Science and Policy, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-6657
Queen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoonoses represent a global public health threat. Understanding lay perceptions of risk associated with these diseases can better inform proportionate policy interventions that mitigate their current and future impacts. While individual zoonoses (e.g. bovine spongiform encephalopathy) have received scientific and public attention, we know little about how multiple zoonotic diseases vary relative to each other in lay risk perceptions. To this end, we examined public perceptions of 11 zoonoses across 12 qualitative attributes of risk among the UK public (

Indexed as

Public HealthZoonosesAnimalsCattleHumansPerceptionSurveys and Questionnairesattitudeshuman–animal interactionpsychometric paradigmrisk perceptionSARS-CoV-2zoonoses

Identifiers

PMID35920028
PMCPMC9346372
OpenAlexW4289528805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.