Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35920022›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

A Medical Student-Run Telehealth Primary Care Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Maintaining Care for the Underserved.

Joshua W Bliss, Annie Yau, Elena Beideck, Jesse S S Novak, Felipe B d'Andrea, Nicolas J Blobel, Ashita S Batavia, Pamela Charney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua W BlissDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Annie YauDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Elena BeideckDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jesse S S NovakWeill Cornell Medicine/Sloan-Kettering/Rockefeller Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2117-8302
Felipe B d'AndreaWeill Cornell Medicine/Sloan-Kettering/Rockefeller Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-4040
Nicolas J BlobelWeill Cornell Medicine/Sloan-Kettering/Rockefeller Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1027-3988
Ashita S BataviaDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Pamela CharneyDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering MST ProgramT32GM007739 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HSU, KATHARINE C · 1985 to 2023
$51.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this report, we outline our approach to implementing a hybrid in-person and virtual clinic model at a student-run free clinic (SRFC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES) are at an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and severe clinical outcomes. It is unclear if telehealth is a viable continuity of care enabler for the underserved.

methodsThe Weill Cornell Community Clinic (WCCC) implemented a novel telehealth clinic model to serve uninsured patients in May 2020. A phone survey of was conducted to assess WCCC patients access to technology needed for telehealth visits (eg, personal computers, smartphones). Patient no-show rates were retrospectively assessed for both in-person (pre-pandemic) and hybrid continuity of care models.

resultsThe phone survey found that 90% of WCCC patients had access to technology needed for telehealth visits. In the 8 months following implementation of the hybrid model, telehealth and in-person no-show rates were 11% (14/128) and 15% (10/67) respectively; the combined hybrid no-show rate was 12% (24/195). For comparison, the in-person 2019 no-show rate was 23% (84/367). This study aligns with previous reports that telehealth improves patient attendance.

conclusionLiterature on the transition of SRFCs from in-person to telehealth care delivery models is limited. At the WCCC, the reduction in no-show rates supports the feasibility and benefits of adopting telehealth for the delivery of care to underserved patient populations. We believe the hybrid telehealth model described here is a viable model for other student run free clinics to increase access to care in low SES communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Student Run ClinicStudents, MedicalTelemedicineHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareRetrospective Studiesaccess to careCOVID-19long term careprimary caretelehealthunderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID35920022
PMCPMC9358338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.