Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919939›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2022

Blood donation behaviour and attitudes towards the 12-month deferral policy among gay and bisexual men in New Zealand.

Koson Tony Sriamporn, Peter Saxton, Nathan Consedine, Mohamed Hammoud, Garrett Prestage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Koson Tony SriampornSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-5182
Peter SaxtonSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nathan ConsedineSchool of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mohamed HammoudKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Garrett PrestageKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council RG132750New Zealand AIDS Foundation FellowshipNew Zealand Mental Health Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGay and bisexual men (GBM) are deferred from donating blood in many countries. Perceptions by GBM that blood donor deferral policies are unjustifiably discriminatory, especially due to advances in HIV prevention, could contribute to non-compliance and need to be understood. We explore blood donation interest and history among GBM and attitudes towards donor deferral policies for the first time in New Zealand (NZ). MATERIALS AND

methodsData from a cross-sectional online survey of GBM in NZ were examined. We constructed three groups: (1) never donated blood and not interested; (2) never donated but expressed interest; and (3) previously donated blood. We tested these for association with demographic and behavioural variables, as well as attitudes towards blood donation policy.

resultsA total of 607 GBM were eligible for the study, of whom 32.9% reported having donated blood previously, 44.3% had never donated blood but expressed interest and 22.7% expressed no interest in donating. Among previous donors, a third (8.6% of the total sample) reported non-compliance with the deferral policy. Most participants found the 12-month deferral policy to be too strict (81.8%), unfair (75.4%) and homophobic (68.8%).

conclusionWe estimate that, for the first time in NZ, almost 10% of the sample did not report compliance with the 12-month deferral policy for men who have sex with men (MSM). Negative attitudes towards the deferral policy were common and could potentially increase the risk to the blood supply if compliance reduces. Further work is needed to inform a deferral policy that is accepted by GBM while maintaining the safety of NZ's blood supply.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesBlood DonorsCross-Sectional StudiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNew ZealandPolicyattitudesblood donationblood safetydeferral policydonorsmen who have sex with men

Identifiers

PMID35919939
PMCPMC9804482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.