Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919789›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Incidence of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reaction among colorectal cancer patients: A 5-year retrospective study.

Sirinoot Palapinyo, Jettanong Klaewsongkram, Virote Sriuranpong, Nutthada Areepium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eosinophils in solid cancers: sentinels, predictors, and therapeutic allies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sirinoot PalapinyoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, College of Pharmacotherapy of Thailand, Thailand. Sirinoot.p@pharm.chula.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-1764
Jettanong KlaewsongkramDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand. Jettanong.K@chula.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-2403
Virote SriuranpongDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand. Virote.S@chula.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-5026
Nutthada AreepiumDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Nutthada.A@pharm.chula.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9917-833X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum compound that has efficacy against colorectal cancer. Hypersensitivity reactions during oxaliplatin infusion are a key problem during its use, with the varying incidences and deficiencies of clearly identified risk factors. Objective: To determine the incidence, severity and risk factors of oxaliplatin-related hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). Method: This retrospective study investigated 245 colorectal cancer patients (1,690 treatment cycles) receiving care at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross society between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The patients' demographic data, laboratory data and clinical features suggesting hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin were reviewed. The Fisher's Exact test and unpaired t-test were used to determine the differences among patients with and without oxaliplatin HSR. The potential risk factors for oxaliplatin HSR were analyzed for statistical significance by logistic regression. Results: A total of 245 colorectal cancer patients (1,690 treatment cycles) were included in this study. The incidence of oxaliplatin HSR was 37.96%, according to the US National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NTCAE) version 5.0, grade 1, grade 2 and higher grades were 27.35% (67 patients), 6.53% (16 patients) and 4.08% (10 patients), respectively. The proportion of male patients and patients with a history of prior exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy were statistically higher in the HSR group. The eosinophil count and serum creatinine level were also significantly greater in the HSR group. On the contrary, the total lymphocyte count and serum albumin level were significantly lower in the HSR group. The multivariate logistic regression found 5 risk factors with a significant difference. Male gender, prior exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy and elevated eosinophil count were associated with increased risk of oxaliplatin HSR, whereas elevated monocyte count and elevated serum albumin were protective factors for the development of oxaliplatin HSR. Conclusion: Colorectal cancer patients treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen with male gender, prior exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy and elevated eosinophil count have a greater risk of oxaliplatin related hypersensitivity reactions.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerHypersensitivity reactionsOxaliplatinRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35919789
PMCPMC9296088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.