Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919763›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2022

Efficiency in the Endoscopy Unit: Can We 'Turn Around' Room Turnover? An Observational Quality Improvement Study.

Carolyn Michelle Tan, Michael Bernstein, Janet Raboud, Benedetta Mannino, Jill Tinmouth

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07723105 (Digital-Supported Versus Standard Informed Consent for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07723105 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Digital-Supported Versus Standard Informed Consent for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy: A Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2026 to 2028Enrolled180ConditionsInformed Consent, Patient Education, Patient Comprehension, Therapeutic EndoscopyArmsDigital-Supported Informed Consent Pathway, Standard Physician-Led Informed Consent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Qualitative evaluation of a video-based tool to support informed consent in colonoscopy.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carolyn Michelle TanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael BernsteinDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Janet RaboudToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Benedetta ManninoDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jill TinmouthDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-2176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopy units are being challenged to provide timely and quality care, despite limited resources and an ever-growing patient population. Decreasing procedure time is unlikely to create sufficient time savings and may compromise quality. Non-procedural factors, such as room turnover, are important contributors to efficiency and represent an ideal target for quality improvement efforts. Aims: The objective of this quality improvement study was to identify practices that will improve endoscopy unit efficiency at our centre. The specific aims were to (a) understand practices at local hospitals that contribute to room turnover efficiency and (b) examine the magnitude and sources of variation in room turnover efficiency across endoscopists and nurses at our centre. Methods: Interviews were conducted with team leads at five local hospitals. Routinely collected data from our centre were analyzed to understand the magnitude and variation in efficiency by provider and reasons for delays. Non-procedure time defined as 'patient 1 scope out' to 'patient 2 scope in' was our primary measure of efficiency. Results: Over the 12-month period, 750 outpatient procedures met inclusion criteria. Median non-procedure time was 19 min (interquartile range: 16-22 min). The variation attributable to endoscopists was 14.7% compared to 80.4% for unmeasured factors. Conclusions: The variation that remains unexplained by our model suggests that unmeasured factors play a substantial role in endoscopy unit efficiency and that our current endoscopy records are not capturing important contributors to efficiency. The next phase will involve focus groups and direct observation with the goal of identifying these unmeasured factors.

Indexed as

EfficiencyEndoscopyNon-procedure timeQuality improvementTurnover time

Identifiers

PMID35919763
PMCPMC9340627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.