Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919757›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

Risk factors of hikikomori among office workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective online survey.

Hiroaki Kubo, Ryoko Katsuki, Kazumasa Horie, Itsuki Yamakawa, Masaru Tateno, Naotaka Shinfuku, Norman Sartorius, Shinji Sakamoto, Takahiro A Kato

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensitivity and Attachment in an Italian Sample of Hikikomori Adolescents and Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hikikomori: A Scientometric Review of 20 Years of Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroaki KuboDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan.
Ryoko KatsukiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan.
Kazumasa HorieDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan.
Itsuki YamakawaDepartment of Health and Human Services, Faculty of Medical and Welfare, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Miyagi, Japan.
Masaru TatenoTokiwa Child Development Center, Tokiwa Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Naotaka ShinfukuSchool of Human Sciences, Seinan Gakuin University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Norman SartoriusAssociation for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shinji SakamotoDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro A KatoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5169-2930
Kyushu University · JPNihon University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPSeinan Gakuin University · JPThe Geneva Association · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global pandemic of COVID-19 has forced people to restrict their outings. In Japan, self-restraint behavior (SRB) has been requested by the government, and some of those decreasing their outings may shift to pathological social withdrawal; hikikomori. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk factors of hikikomori conducting an online prospective survey. An online survey was conducted in June 2020 and December 2020; (1) SRB-related indicators (degree of SRB, motivation for SRB, stigma and self-stigma toward COVID-19, anxiety and depressive feelings toward COVID-19) and (2) general mental health (hikikomori tendency, depressive symptoms, modern type depression (MTD) tendency, internet addiction) were collected. A cross-lagged effects model was performed to examine the association between these variables. Lack of emotional support and lack of socialization in June 2020 increased isolation in December 2020. Besides, MTD and hikikomori interacted with each other. Interestingly, although hikikomori tendency increased depressive tendencies, SRB itself did not have a significant path on any mental health-related variables. Poor interpersonal relationships, rather than SRB per se, are suggested to be a risk factor for increased isolation among office workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. Appropriate early interventions such as interpersonal or emotional support may prevent the transition to pathological hikikomori. The association between MTD and hikikomori seems to reveal the interesting possibility that MTD is a gateway to increased risk of hikikomori, and that hikikomori is a gateway to MTD as well. Future research is required to elucidate the relationship between hikikomori and MTD.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicHikikomori (pathological social withdrawal)Modern-type depression (MTD)Office workersSelf-restraint behavior

Identifiers

PMID35919757
PMCPMC9334542
OpenAlexW4288713260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.