Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919500›Full record

ReviewContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Review on Hybrid Segmentation Methods for Identification of Brain Tumor in MRI.

Khurram Ejaz, Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim, Muhammad Arif, Diana Izdrui, Daniela Maria Craciun, Oana Geman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khurram EjazDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohd Shafry Mohd RahimUniversity of Technology Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Muhammad ArifDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7449-2701
Diana IzdruiFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Stefan Cel Mare University of Suceava, Suceava, Romania.
Daniela Maria CraciunFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Stefan Cel Mare University of Suceava, Suceava, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8358-968X
Oana GemanFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Stefan Cel Mare University of Suceava, Suceava, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8347-8733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modalities like MRI give information about organs and highlight diseases. Organ information is visualized in intensities. The segmentation method plays an important role in the identification of the region of interest (ROI). The ROI can be segmented from the image using clustering, features, and region extraction. Segmentation can be performed in steps; firstly, the region is extracted from the image. Secondly, feature extraction performed, and better features are selected. They can be shape, texture, or intensity. Thirdly, clustering segments the shape of tumor, tumor has specified shape, and shape is detected by feature. Clustering consists of FCM, K-means, FKM, and their hybrid. To support the segmentation, we conducted three studies (region extraction, feature, and clustering) which are discussed in the first line of this review paper. All these studies are targeting MRI as a modality. MRI visualization proved to be more accurate for the identification of diseases compared with other modalities. Information of the modality is compromised due to low pass image. In MRI Images, the tumor intensities are variable in tumor areas as well as in tumor boundaries.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsFuzzy LogicHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35919500
PMCPMC9293518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.