Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919489›Full record

ReviewImmunotherapy advances2022

Combination of genetically engineered T cells and immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of cancer.

Rafaela Rossetti, Heloísa Brand, Sarah Caroline Gomes Lima, Izadora Peter Furtado, Roberta Maraninchi Silveira, Daianne Maciely Carvalho Fantacini, Dimas Tadeu Covas, Lucas Eduardo Botelho de Souza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunotherapy advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Combination with Atezolizumab in Patients with Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The Phase 1/2 ZUMA-6 Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Targeted delivery platforms forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafaela RossettiCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Heloísa BrandCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sarah Caroline Gomes LimaCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Izadora Peter FurtadoCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberta Maraninchi SilveiraCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daianne Maciely Carvalho FantaciniCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dimas Tadeu CovasCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas Eduardo Botelho de SouzaCenter for Cell-Based Therapy, Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-7509
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint (IC) blockade using monoclonal antibodies is currently one of the most successful immunotherapeutic interventions to treat cancer. By reinvigorating antitumor exhausted T cells, this approach can lead to durable clinical responses. However, the majority of patients either do not respond or present a short-lived response to IC blockade, in part due to a scarcity of tumor-specific T cells within the tumor microenvironment. Adoptive transfer of T cells genetically engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or engineered T-cell receptors (TCRs) provide the necessary tumor-specific immune cell population to target cancer cells. However, this therapy has been considerably ineffective against solid tumors in part due to IC-mediated immunosuppressive effects within the tumor microenvironment. These limitations could be overcome by associating adoptive cell transfer of genetically engineered T cells and IC blockade. In this comprehensive review, we highlight the strategies and outcomes of preclinical and clinical attempts to disrupt IC signaling in adoptive T-cell transfer against cancer. These strategies include combined administration of genetically engineered T cells and IC inhibitors, engineered T cells with intrinsic modifications to disrupt IC signaling, and the design of CARs against IC molecules. The current landscape indicates that the synergy of the fast-paced refinements of gene-editing technologies and synthetic biology and the increased comprehension of IC signaling will certainly translate into a novel and more effective immunotherapeutic approaches to treat patients with cancer.

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapychimeric antigen receptorengineered T cellsgene editingimmune checkpoint inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35919489
PMCPMC9327125
OpenAlexW4210621547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.