ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2022
[Ocular syphilis associated to HIV: A report of 2 patients treated in Marrakech, Morocco].
Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease. All organs might be affected, but ocular syphilis occurs only in 0.6 percent of patients. A resurgence of syphilis cases has been observed for several years in many countries, especially in HIV-infected subjects. These patients often present with concomitant primary and secondary lesions or extensive presentations of syphilis. Case reports: We report 2 patients with syphilitic uveitis diagnosed and treated at the department of infectious diseases at the University hospital of Marrakech. Ocular involvement was inaugural in both HIV patients. Each had a specific treatment, but none had a complete recovery of visual function; the first patient was treated by ceftriaxone and the second one was treated by penicillin. Conclusion: Syphilis must be discussed in all patients diagnosed with uveitis or papillitis. The diagnosis should be suspected in cases of eye inflammation even in the absence of favourable clinical presentation or anamnesis. Search for HIV co-infection should be systematic. Although not evidence-based, prompt therapy may lead to functional recovery. Ceftriaxone could be a suitable alternative to penicillin in the treatment of early syphilis in HIV-infected patients. This treatment has a concomitant effectiveness even for asymptomatic forms of neurosyphilis. Ocular syphilis is a form of neurosyphilis and requires neurosyphilis therapy regardless of when it develops after primary infection.Conventional syphilis staging is of little use in understanding ocular syphilis. Co-infection between HIV and ocular syphilis is common, but does not affect response to a neurosyphilis regimen of penicillin in the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.