Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919110›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2022

Postoperative quality of life after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a prospective longitudinal observation study.

Chao-Jie Wang, Yun-Suhk Suh, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Ji-Hyeon Park, Shin-Hoo Park, Jong-Ho Choi, Fadhel Alzahrani, Khalid Alzahrani, Seong-Ho Kong, Do-Joong Park and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Chao-Jie WangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-084X
Yun-Suhk SuhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-8482
Hyuk-Joon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-647X
Ji-Hyeon ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-8895
Shin-Hoo ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9767-6100
Jong-Ho ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6963-7075
Fadhel AlzahraniDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-222X
Khalid AlzahraniDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-0106
Seong-Ho KongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-796X
Do-Joong ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-6127
Hui CaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-1910
Han-Kwang YangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-3048
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNEulji University · KRKorea University · KRSaad Specialist Hospital · SATaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life (QOL) questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, and QLQ-STO22) are widely used for the assessment of gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to use these questionnaires to evaluate QOL in postgastrectomy patients. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 106 patients with distal gastrectomy (DG), 57 with pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), and 117 with total gastrectomy (TG). Body weight and QOL questionnaires were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (at 3 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months). Results: TG patients had significantly more weight loss than DG/PPG patients. Compared with DG, patients after PPG had less dyspnea (P = 0.008) and trouble with coughing (P = 0.049), but more severe symptoms of insomnia (P = 0.037) and reflux (P = 0.030) at postoperative 12 months. Compared with DG/PPG, TG was associated with worse body image, dysphagia, eating, and taste in both OG25 and STO22. Moreover, OG25 revealed worse QOL in the TG group with respect to odynophagia, eating with others, choked when swallowing, trouble talking, and weight loss. The QOL of patients who received chemotherapy was worse than those in the chemo-free group in both physical functioning and symptoms such as nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, and trouble with taste; however, these side effects would soon disappear after finishing chemotherapy. Conclusion: PPG was similar to DG in terms of postoperative QOL and maintaining body weight, while TG was always inferior to both DG and PPG. Adjuvant chemotherapy can affect both body weight and QOL despite being reversible.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of lifeGastrectomyQuality of lifeWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID35919110
PMCPMC9300440
OpenAlexW4286355005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.