ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors using Raman spectroscopy: A machine learning approach.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurosurgical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Fluorescence Assessment for Augmented Imaging and Decision Support in Glioblastoma Resections.Cancers · 2026Article
- Spectral discrimination of pediatric SF188 and adult glioblastoma stem cells by deep learning-enhanced Raman profiling.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Random splicing assisted deep learning for breast cancer cell line classification via Raman spectroscopy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Current Applications of Raman Spectroscopy in Intraoperative Neurosurgery.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Machine Learning-Assisted Classification of Paraffin-Embedded Brain Tumors with Raman Spectroscopy.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Computational Assessment of Spectral Heterogeneity within Fresh Glioblastoma Tissue Using Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning Algorithms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Translating Biospectroscopy Techniques to Clinical Settings: A New Paradigm in Point-of-Care Screening and/or Diagnostics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Raman Spectroscopy as a Tool to Study the Pathophysiology of Brain Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Neurooncology: 2023 update.Free neuropathology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in pediatric oncology diagnosis.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Review
- Raman spectroscopy: A prospective intraoperative visualization technique for gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection is a mainstay in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors to achieve tissue diagnosis and tumor debulking. While maximal safe resection of tumors is desired, it can be challenging to differentiate normal brain from neoplastic tissue using only microscopic visualization, intraoperative navigation, and tactile feedback. Here, we investigate the potential for Raman spectroscopy (RS) to accurately diagnose pediatric brain tumors intraoperatively. Methods: Using a rapid acquisition RS device, we intraoperatively imaged fresh ex vivo brain tissue samples from 29 pediatric patients at the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital between October 2018 and March 2020 in a prospective fashion. Small tissue samples measuring 2-4 mm per dimension were obtained with each individual tissue sample undergoing multiple unique Raman spectra acquisitions. All tissue samples from which Raman spectra were acquired underwent individual histopathology review. A labeled dataset of 678 unique Raman spectra gathered from 160 samples was then used to develop a machine learning model capable of (1) differentiating normal brain from tumor tissue and (2) normal brain from low-grade glioma (LGG) tissue. Results: Trained logistic regression model classifiers were developed using our labeled dataset. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for our tumor vs normal brain model was 0.94. The AUC of the ROC curve for LGG vs normal brain was 0.91. Conclusions: Our work suggests that RS can be used to develop a machine learning-based classifier to differentiate tumor vs non-tumor tissue during resection of pediatric brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.