Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919066›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Deep learning-based fully automated differential diagnosis of eyelid basal cell and sebaceous carcinoma using whole slide images.

Yingxiu Luo, Jiayi Zhang, Yidi Yang, Yamin Rao, Xingyu Chen, Tianlei Shi, Shiqiong Xu, Renbing Jia, Xin Gao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yingxiu Luo *Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi Zhang *Medical Imaging Department, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Yidi YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yamin RaoDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xingyu ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tianlei ShiMedical Imaging Department, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Shiqiong XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Renbing JiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xin GaoMedical Imaging Department, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Shanghai Institute of Hematology · CNShanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The differential diagnosis of eyelid basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is highly dependent on pathologist's experience. Herein, we proposed a fully automated differential diagnostic method, which used deep learning (DL) to accurately classify eyelid BCC and SC based on whole slide images (WSIs). Methods: We used 116 haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections from 116 eyelid BCC patients and 180 H&E-stained sections from 129 eyelid SC patients treated at the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from 2017 to 2019. The method comprises two stages: patch prediction by the DenseNet-161 architecture-based DL model and WSI differentiation by an average-probability strategy-based integration module, and its differential performance was assessed by the carcinoma differentiation accuracy and F1 score. We compared the classification performance of the method with that of three pathologists, two junior and one senior. To validate the auxiliary value of the method, we compared the pathologists' BCC and SC classification with and without the assistance of our proposed method. Results: Our proposed method achieved an accuracy of 0.983, significantly higher than that of the three pathologists (0.644 and 0.729 for the two junior pathologists and 0.831 for the senior pathologist). With the method's assistance, the pathologists' accuracy increased significantly (P<0.05), by 28.8% and 15.2%, respectively, for the two junior pathologists and by 11.8% for the senior pathologist. Conclusions: Our proposed method accurately classifies eyelid BCC and SC and effectively improves the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists. It may therefore facilitate the development of appropriate and timely therapeutic plans.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)Eyelid carcinomapathological diagnosiswhole slide image (WSI)

Identifiers

PMID35919066
PMCPMC9338367
OpenAlexW4285529244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.