ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Deep learning-based fully automated differential diagnosis of eyelid basal cell and sebaceous carcinoma using whole slide images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Detection of basal cell carcinoma on whole-slide images from Mohs micrographic surgery using weakly supervised learning.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Oncology and Pathology: A Call for Contributions.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Surface Tumors: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based non-invasive differential diagnosis of eyelid basal cell and sebaceous gland carcinomas using photographic images.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- AI assistance enhances histopathologic distinction between sebaceous and squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ocular and Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma with First-Time Description of Dermoscopic and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Features of Caruncle Basal Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bibliometric analysis of research on the application of deep learning to ophthalmology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Machine Learning in the Management of Intraocular Cancers: A Narrative Review.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Review
- Whole slide imaging-based deep learning to predict the treatment response of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- MAC-ResNet: Knowledge Distillation Based Lightweight Multiscale-Attention-Crop-ResNet for Eyelid Tumors Detection and Classification.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Orbital and eyelid diseases: The next breakthrough in artificial intelligence?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The differential diagnosis of eyelid basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is highly dependent on pathologist's experience. Herein, we proposed a fully automated differential diagnostic method, which used deep learning (DL) to accurately classify eyelid BCC and SC based on whole slide images (WSIs). Methods: We used 116 haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections from 116 eyelid BCC patients and 180 H&E-stained sections from 129 eyelid SC patients treated at the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from 2017 to 2019. The method comprises two stages: patch prediction by the DenseNet-161 architecture-based DL model and WSI differentiation by an average-probability strategy-based integration module, and its differential performance was assessed by the carcinoma differentiation accuracy and F1 score. We compared the classification performance of the method with that of three pathologists, two junior and one senior. To validate the auxiliary value of the method, we compared the pathologists' BCC and SC classification with and without the assistance of our proposed method. Results: Our proposed method achieved an accuracy of 0.983, significantly higher than that of the three pathologists (0.644 and 0.729 for the two junior pathologists and 0.831 for the senior pathologist). With the method's assistance, the pathologists' accuracy increased significantly (P<0.05), by 28.8% and 15.2%, respectively, for the two junior pathologists and by 11.8% for the senior pathologist. Conclusions: Our proposed method accurately classifies eyelid BCC and SC and effectively improves the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists. It may therefore facilitate the development of appropriate and timely therapeutic plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.