Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35919049›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Automatic evaluation of endometrial receptivity in three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound images based on 3D U-Net segmentation.

Xue Wang, Nan Bao, Xing Xin, Jichun Tan, Hong Li, Shi Zhou, Hao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Application of artificial intelligence to ultrasound imaging for benign gynecological disorders: systematic review.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xue Wang *College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Nan Bao *College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Xing XinCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jichun TanCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hong LiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Shi ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Hao LiuState Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endometrial thickness is an essential factor affecting female fertility. Clinically, ultrasound imaging is the first choice for the examination of uterine and endometrial-related diseases. However, the boundary of some endometrial is challenging to distinguish due to the effects of image resolution and noise. In addition, the irregular shape of the endometrium makes it more difficult for doctors to measure its thickness. Through the automatic segmentation and extraction of the endometrium, the maximum thickness of the endometrium can be measured automatically and accurately. This provides a quantitative index for doctors to use diagnostically. Methods: In this study, 85 cases of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D TVUS) images were collected retrospectively, including 75 cases of endometrial adhesion and 10 cases of non-adhesion. Firstly, the ultrasound images were filtered by block-matching and 3D filtering and speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion (SRAD). These two kinds of filtered images were combined with the original image to construct a three-channel image. Then, the augmented images were sent to 3D U-Net to realize endometrium segmentation. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard, sensitivity, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Finally, the medial axis transform was used to extract the endometrial centerline, based on which the endometrial thickness could be automatically measured. Results: The endometrium segmentation method proposed in this paper achieved 90.83% in Dice, 83.35% in Jaccard, 90.85% in sensitivity, and 12.75 mm in HD95 in the testing set. Taking the doctor's manual measurement as the gold standard, 94.20% of the automatic endometrial thickness measurements based on the segmentation results were within the allowable error range of clinical diagnosis. Conclusions: This paper presents an automatic endometrium segmentation and thickness measurement method for 3D TVUS images. The experimental results show that this method has high segmentation accuracy to recognize endometrial adhesion images. Furthermore, the thickness measurement based on the segmentation results has high reliability and repeatability, and the accuracy can meet clinical diagnosis needs.

Indexed as

deep learningendometrium segmentationthickness measurementThree-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound images (3D TVUS images)

Identifiers

PMID35919049
PMCPMC9338380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.