ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Automatic evaluation of endometrial receptivity in three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound images based on 3D U-Net segmentation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence to ultrasound imaging for benign gynecological disorders: systematic review.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of the interaction between ovarian markers and the endometrium on the outcomes of assisted reproduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional regulatory architecture of endometrial receptivity and its translational implications for implantation failure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A New Era in Fertility Treatment.Cureus · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a semi-automatic radiomics ensemble model for preoperative evaluation of breast masses in mammotome-assisted minimally invasive resection.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial receptivity in patients with intrauterine adhesion following endometrial polyp surgery and their impact on pregnancy.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Automated assessment of endometrial receptivity for screening recurrent pregnancy loss risk using deep learning-enhanced ultrasound and clinical data.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- End-to-end deep learning radiomics: development and validation of a novel attention-based aggregate convolutional neural network to distinguish breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from breast invasive ductal carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Automated Detection of Endometrial Polyps from Hysteroscopic Videos Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial thickness is an essential factor affecting female fertility. Clinically, ultrasound imaging is the first choice for the examination of uterine and endometrial-related diseases. However, the boundary of some endometrial is challenging to distinguish due to the effects of image resolution and noise. In addition, the irregular shape of the endometrium makes it more difficult for doctors to measure its thickness. Through the automatic segmentation and extraction of the endometrium, the maximum thickness of the endometrium can be measured automatically and accurately. This provides a quantitative index for doctors to use diagnostically. Methods: In this study, 85 cases of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D TVUS) images were collected retrospectively, including 75 cases of endometrial adhesion and 10 cases of non-adhesion. Firstly, the ultrasound images were filtered by block-matching and 3D filtering and speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion (SRAD). These two kinds of filtered images were combined with the original image to construct a three-channel image. Then, the augmented images were sent to 3D U-Net to realize endometrium segmentation. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard, sensitivity, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Finally, the medial axis transform was used to extract the endometrial centerline, based on which the endometrial thickness could be automatically measured. Results: The endometrium segmentation method proposed in this paper achieved 90.83% in Dice, 83.35% in Jaccard, 90.85% in sensitivity, and 12.75 mm in HD95 in the testing set. Taking the doctor's manual measurement as the gold standard, 94.20% of the automatic endometrial thickness measurements based on the segmentation results were within the allowable error range of clinical diagnosis. Conclusions: This paper presents an automatic endometrium segmentation and thickness measurement method for 3D TVUS images. The experimental results show that this method has high segmentation accuracy to recognize endometrial adhesion images. Furthermore, the thickness measurement based on the segmentation results has high reliability and repeatability, and the accuracy can meet clinical diagnosis needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.