ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Clinical, tomographic, and topometric outcomes of progressive thickness intracorneal ring segment implantations in duck-type keratoconus.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of keratoconus: an updated review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Asymmetric Intracorneal Ring Segments for the Management of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the visual, refractive, tomographic, and topometric outcomes of progressive thickness intracorneal ring segment (PT-ICRS) implantation in duck-type keratoconus. Methods: This retrospective study included eyes with oval (duck-type) keratoconus treated with PT-ICRS implantation. After the femtosecond laser tunnel creation, one PT-ICRS (Keraring AS 5 with 160° arc length) was implanted along the ectatic, inferior half of the cornea. Data of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), refraction, asphericity (Q value), and keratometry (K) were compared pre- and postoperatively. Additionally, changes in the topometric indices of corneal irregularity were also evaluated after PT-ICRS implantation. Results: Thirty-one eyes of 30 patients were included in the study with a mean follow-up time of 9.06 months (ranging between 6 and 18 months). UDVA improved from 0.85 ± 0.36 to 0.27 ± 0.14 logMAR (P = 0.001), and CDVA improved from 0.37 ± 0.22 to 0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR (P = 0.001). The mean spherical error decreased from -3.66 ± 2.60 to -1.60 ± 1.42 D (P = 0.001), and the mean cylindrical error decreased from -4.91 ± 2.65 to - 1.41 ± 1.31 D (P = 0.001). All topographic parameters measured from the anterior cornea demonstrated statistically significant improvements after PT-ICRS implantation (P = 0.001). K mean, K maximum, corneal astigmatism, and Q value showed a significant decrease. Besides the index of height asymmetry, all topometric indices were significantly reduced after PT-ICRS implantation. There were no loss of lines and no complications. Conclusion: PT-ICRS implantation in duck-type keratoconus is an effective and safe treatment. This intervention improves the visual acuity, refractive error, topographical, and topometric parameters significantly by decreasing both eccentricity and steepness of the cone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.