Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35918886›Full record

SynthesisObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2022

Impact of program characteristics on weight loss in adult behavioral weight management interventions: systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, José M Ordóñez-Mena, Annika Theodoulou, Ailsa R Butler, Suzanne C Freeman, Alex J Sutton, Susan A Jebb, Paul Aveyard

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. [Cost-effectiveness of the Lose Weight, Gain Life program].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jamie Hartmann-BoyceNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-3049
José M Ordóñez-MenaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Annika TheodoulouNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ailsa R ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Suzanne C FreemanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Alex J SuttonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Susan A JebbNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-4217

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/17/68/33247Department of Health 14/178/29Department of Health 15/09/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBehavioral weight management programs (BWMPs) for adults lead to greater weight loss at 12 months than minimal-intervention control treatments. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in the content of BWMPs and outcomes of treatment. This study assessed the contribution of individual components of BWMPs, using Bayesian component network meta-analysis.

methodsRandomized controlled trials of BWMPs in adults were identified (latest search: December 2019) and arms coded for presence or absence of 29 intervention components grouped by type, content, provider, mode of delivery, and intensity.

resultsA total of 169 studies (41 judged at high risk of bias) were included in the main analysis. Six components had effect estimates indicating clinically significant benefit and credible intervals (CrIs) excluding no difference: change in diet (mean difference [MD] = -1.84 kg, 95% CrI: -2.91 to -0.80); offering partial (MD = -2.12 kg, 95% CrI: -3.39 to -0.89) or total meal replacements (MD = -2.63 kg, 95% CrI: -4.58 to -0.73); delivery by a psychologist/counselor (MD = -1.45 kg, 95% CrI: -2.81 to -0.06) or dietitian (MD = -1.31 kg, 95% CrI: -2.40 to -0.24); and home setting (MD = -1.05 kg, 95% CrI: -2.02 to -0.09).

conclusionsFuture program development should consider including these components; other approaches continue to warrant evaluation of effectiveness.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyWeight LossAdultBayes TheoremBiasHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35918886
PMCPMC9546221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.